Folks, What Mario says is very important to keep in mind. Yet it is true that there are other cases where "including" such as "remote transclusion" content has a different licencing or ethical profile.
- The site imbedding the content is a document used by one owner and he/she is aware of the licencing issues - The site is imbedding your own content stored locally, or from a server you own. - The content imbedded is from a site that permits this, and usually provides the embed code to do this. - There may also be some cases where if you acknowledge the source of content and provide sufficient information, even promote the the service you are imbedding content from it may be OK, but this can be hard to be sure you are not breaking copy write. My argument would be that TiddlyWiki is a platform and we should technically enable "remote transclusion" and provide matching high level legal/ethical guidance to tiddlywiki users/designers - as Mario has done. Regards Tones On Friday, 12 March 2021 at 02:43:41 UTC+11 Mark S. wrote: > >> 2: Technically you are stealing someone elses bandwidth, if you use their >> servers to display their eg: images >> >> > But if you're using a TW that only you see (i.e. private), it's the exact > same bandwidth as if you had visited the page. > > A publicly available TW, of course, is different. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/0a725ef7-c24d-4cb7-b371-62b931df07b2n%40googlegroups.com.
