Update: I left a few tiddlers out of the BLT tag pill for dragging to your 
file (
*https://giffmex.org/experiments/.blt.template.html#BLT%20usage%20and%20installation*).
 
It is now updated as of 10:15am EST, so you can refresh your browser and 
you will see there are 6 tiddlers to import, not 3.

On Friday, April 2, 2021 at 8:49:03 AM UTC-6 David Gifford wrote:

> @Si
>
> 1-100 seems like overkill. Wouldn't 1-5 be sufficient to rank your 
> motivation for reading a work?
>
> Your workflow follows good practices for reading in order to write. Very 
> similar to what many have been suggesting, for example, Ramses Blog on his 
> notetaking process, Tiago Forte's progressive summarization, Anne-Laure 
> LeCunff's from collector to creator, etc.
>
> My process is different because I take notes in order to have a well of 
> interconnected ideas to refer to when I eventually write a sermon on a 
> passage or topic. This is slightly different from taking notes for content 
> when your job is to produce constant new content.
>
> For references to the source, I use the comptext plugin, which does 
> autocomplete of links after typing [[ . So you can filter then add the 
> source after the note. Then I type the page #, then I use @ as an alias so 
> that long titles to the source don't distract visually from the note. 
> [[@|This is a long title of a book (Author last name)]] looks like @. 
>
> If you use the BLT setup I described to Lin OneTwo above, you will be able 
> to see links, backlinks and tags next to your tiddler. The only issue is 
> that because you use Streams, the backlinks are not to the topic tiddler or 
> source tiddler, but to the node tiddler, e.g., Roadmap/20200610185807828 
> <https://saqimtiaz.github.io/sq-tw/temp/streams-0.2-preview.html#Roadmap%2F20200610185807828>.
>  
> Streams 0.2 preview uses a breadcrumb menu, though, so if you go to the 
> node tiddler, you can navigate up to the parent tiddler.
> On Friday, April 2, 2021 at 3:34:06 AM UTC-6 si wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Its great seeing how other people use TW, I would love to see more posts 
>> like yours (or video demos).
>>
>> My workflow for reading is probably closer to the one that Soren shows in 
>> his demo. Very similar to the Zettlecasten/'How to take Smart Notes' 
>> approach.
>>
>> I add tiddlers for books and articles that I want to read, along with a 
>> 'priority' field with a value from 1-100. This acts as subjective 
>> indication of how worthwhile it will be to spend time on that particular 
>> source.
>>
>> Then I generate a big list of sources, sorted by priority. When I want to 
>> read something I glance at the list and pick anything from the list that I 
>> am attracted to in that moment. Since the list is sorted by priority I am 
>> mostly going to be seeing stuff of high value, but I allow myself to scroll 
>> down if there is nothing of interest.
>>
>> When I am reading I capture 'fleeting notes' and flashcards. I make these 
>> notes using Streams <https://saqimtiaz.github.io/streams/> on the 
>> tiddler for whatever source I am reading. While reading I am also trying to 
>> identify the main ideas within the source. When I notice a main idea I 
>> create a new tiddler for it (an 'Evergreen note'). This tiddler doesn't 
>> need to have any text at this point.
>>
>> Once I have made fleeting notes, I want to figure out what main idea is 
>> built from them. Streams is really helpful here. I can drag and drop the 
>> nodes to try and make sense of them and build a coherent structure. 
>> Eventually they will be dragged into the relevant Evergreen note (in some 
>> ways this is similar to what Soren was doing when he excised portions of 
>> his book notes into their own tiddler). I might later rewrite these notes 
>> and collapse them into their parent tiddler using the Streams to Text 
>> plugin 
>> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/vYqDup5qAAs/m/T9ssODGqAgAJ>.
>>
>> This process does not happen linearly. Because I am making flashcards, I 
>> can read just a part of a source then return to it months later without any 
>> problem. I am also moving fleeting notes to evergreen notes throughout the 
>> process - not just waiting until I have finished the source. I have begun 
>> to think of this as part of the whole process of reading.
>>
>> The main problem I have with this workflow is retaining references to the 
>> original source. Once the notes get moved to their permanent home, the 
>> original context is lost. This is of secondary importance, but it would be 
>> nice to be able to retain a link back to the original source of the 
>> information. (Anyone have any tips on how to approach this?)
>>
>> Anyway there's a few other parts to this workflow but that's the gist of 
>> what I do.
>> On Thursday, 1 April 2021 at 15:07:37 UTC+1 David Gifford wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> One benefit of watching Soren's video on TiddlyWiki was seeing his 
>>> workflow, which was so different from mine. I would be interested in 
>>> hearing what workflows people have for doing things in TiddlyWiki, and any 
>>> tweaks they use to fine tune those workflows.
>>>
>>> I will share two, to get the conversation started: 
>>>
>>> 1. I clone editor toolbar buttons to create new buttons that I use to 
>>> insert things, like a link to the tiddler for the source I am reading 
>>> currently, e.g., [[@|AntiFragile (Taleb)]]. I do the same to wrap things 
>>> like <span class=""> and </span>. That way when when I am taking notes on a 
>>> book, I paste the source after my note and add the page number. Or when I 
>>> am adding CSS like indentation, font color, etc, I wrap with the span class 
>>> and type the class I am applying. An app like PhraseExpress is another way 
>>> to do this, and I have experimented with it. 
>>>
>>> 2. I now have a setup I call BLT that shows backlinks, links and tags in 
>>> the sidebar, which makes it easy to navigate to related content, even while 
>>> in editing mode, and easy to read related content in the sidebar while not 
>>> losing my place in the current tiddler. So I am taking notes on a book in 
>>> the story river in edit mode, but have a list of all the links, backlinks 
>>> and tags off to the side to read right there or open to edit. I took some 
>>> notes with this setup over the last couple of days, and wow, I like it a 
>>> lot.
>>>
>>> What are some of your workflows? Mine are about note-taking, but maybe 
>>> yours are about other uses of TiddlyWiki? I would really love to learn from 
>>> all you pros here. Blessings.
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3c05e30e-86a4-4d72-adb6-87ed077e9422n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to