Good idea Florian,

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 8:41 PM 'Florian Felix' via TiddlyWiki <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Well, I'm into the whole "digital gardening" wormhole.
> Tidllywiki is kind of interesting here because it actually does a lot what
> is required for "digital gardening" - it is in itself a notetaking tool,
> does transclusion, plugins are available... the possibility of tiddlymap
> for visualization ... also it is highly customizable which is  always
> great. It has a search and easy commenting going, what many static site
> publishing systems are kind of struggling with.
> The main benefits of static export in tiddlywiki is probably easier
> searchability ( i think), a more useroriented layout and choosing what you
> publish.
> That's what ssg's do good and there are tons of themes available that
> don't need to be developped.




> templating static site export in TW so far has been not very easy to
> understand for me,


I think the reason is there is not enough documentation on this. The
current community tools and docs are old and stranded in the net!
I have tried this and created some tools and publishing is like a one click
in browser or run a shell script!

See this example from a year ago: https://github.com/kookma/TW-StaticPages
It needs a working node.js

1. fire up your wiki
2. create tiddlers
3. tags those you like to be published (e.g tag with public)
4. From terminal issue tiddlywiki --build static

So, this is much easier than Jekyll!

You can integrate other css, themes and any html template you like!


Another example TiddlyJam recently announced

Jeremy is working on a publishing framework, I am waiting to see how this
new tool works!
Have a look at https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/pull/5559



> in comparison to jekyll, and then you possibly loose some features like
> the search or the commenting, or a toggleable sidebar (not saying they're
> impossile to port or recreate, but i haven't seen it).


These are possible and I think Jeremy will add search tool for static site!

>
> so maybe that could be combined?
> integrate TW with an SSG via plugins? publish from TW via SSG, inheriting
> macros and linking to ensure digital gardening capabilities  but doing the
> "macro" via the ssg?
> (maybe possible with "nikola" based on python and the pytiddlywiki package
> ?) This would then enable to combine Tiddlywiki based and other content.
>
> from the other side, is it possible to use a tiddlywiki theme that you
> don't use dynamically but have installed for static export, and (how) could
> i port a theme fom a static site engine?
>


Tiddlywiki can acts as static site generator, so the site it generates can
be totally different from what TW itself is!



>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8382f518-4c23-4465-8ef6-fd6768efcd82n%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8382f518-4c23-4465-8ef6-fd6768efcd82n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAAV1gMDayRrzYdPc47k7n6_i9f_Ycjs95gCbsDP_gsROH%2B6yYw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to