I had tested my stuff in the upcoming 5.1.24 online as the screen capture show.
With the latest pieces of information you gave, I can see that there can be a reason of my code failure. This is relief. I have the decided to have a go at variables updating themselves, to see what it can do. Here is my test code: ==== \define just-count() <$set name=z value="42"> <$action-log $$message="1." $$filter=z/> <$set name=z1 value="z1=<<z>>"> <$set name=z filter="[<z>add[3]]"> <$action-log $$message="2." $$filter=z/> <$set name=z2 value="z2=<<z>>"> <$set name=z filter="[<z>add[12]]"> <$action-log $$message="3." $$filter=z/> <$set name=z3 value="<<z1>> ; <<z2>> ; z3=<<z>>"/> <<z3>> <$action-log $$message=<<z3>>/> </$set></$set></$set></$set></$set></$set> \end \define only-count() <$set name=z value="42"> <$set name=z1 value="z1=<<z>>"> <$set name=z filter="[<z>add[3]]"> <$set name=z2 value="z2=<<z>>"> <$set name=z filter="[<z>add[12]]"> <$set name=z3 value="<<z1>> ; <<z2>> ; z3=<<z>>"> only-count: <<z3>> </$set></$set></$set></$set></$set></$set> \end \define wiki-count() <$set name=z value=42> <$wikify name=z1 text="z1=<<z>>"> <$set name=z filter="[<z>add[3]]"> <$wikify name=z2 text="z2=<<z>>"> <$set name=z filter="[<z>add[12]]"> <$wikify name=z3 text="<<z1>> ; <<z2>> ; z3=<<z>>"> wiki-count: <<z3>> </$wikify></$set></$wikify></$set></$wikify></$set> \end <$button actions=<<just-count>>> just count (see console)!</$button> <br><<only-count>> <br><<wiki-count>> ====== output in tiddler: only-count: z1=57 ; z2=57 ; z3=57 wiki-count: z1=42 ; z2=45 ; z3=57 summarized output in console if button pressed: 1. z=42 2. z=45 3. z=57 with the button, it's fine but is there a problem with the number of closing </$set> or is a single one just fine? (not in the context of my code, but it could be the case if I was not defining z1, z2 and z3 in just-count macro) without the button, we can see that the transitional values of z must be captured, hence my using the wikify widdget. Otherwisi all occurrence of z have the final value. I'm pretty sure this is a feature, not a bug, isn't it? This being said, I will have a try at recursion and report here. Le vendredi 23 avril 2021 à 21:39:20 UTC+2, [email protected] a écrit : > The sequence of execution of action widgets within a single block/string > is not guaranteed. Therefore you cannot reliably set a value in an > action-widget and read it in a subsequent one if they are part of the same > block of action widgets which have the same trigger. This is a known design > limitation of the action-widget implementation. > > You can work around this in limited situations with the Button widget by > executing some actions in the body of the button and others in the actions > attribute. Otherwise for things like having a counter, recursive macros are > an option. > > > >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/37fc25b7-0c55-432e-8daa-a69b07e9227cn%40googlegroups.com.
