TiddlyWiki's Tiddler Template could be modified to show something other than the title field in the "title area" of a tiddler. Not sure how much fiddling it would take to get that working.
Using createdate is a really quick way to go, It can only be a little bit lousy on a day in which a whole bunch of (wildly?) unrelated tiddlers got created, but then one could add all sorts of extra filtering in the URL to exclude certain kinds of tiddlers. On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 11:02:21 AM UTC-3 ludwa6 wrote: > I've been following your forms development w/ interest, Charlie -and this > makes it all the more interesting- but i really think this idea of > permalinks using createdate is much simpler, if indeed that attribute > satisfies the 2 aforementioned criteria. There is so much goodness in a TW > instance that is title-dependent, i'm afraid that throwing some > auto-generated code into the title would compromise its human-friendliness, > if nothing else. /w > > On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 2:43:16 PM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote: > >> G'day walt, >> >> That is a huge pain point for me. In my previous career, I relied >> heavily on the ProjectForum Wiki to keep track of everything. It did not >> use page names in URL links, but rather used auto-generated unique >> identifiers. So I could change page titles to my heart's content, knowing >> that URL links were always stable. >> >> My approach, still formulating it, is to edit tiddlers via custom forms. >> The tiddlers have auto-generated unique identifiers stored in the title. >> What would normally be the title goes in a field. >> >> That works fine right as-is for structured data. I haven't looked into >> setting up the formatting buttons (bold, italics, etc.) for formatting text. >> >> I think this could still work for you well if you have an easy way to >> lookup tiddlers via a field instead of via title, and if you can overcome >> that mindset change. >> >> On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 5:34:24 AM UTC-3 ludwa6 wrote: >> >>> The more i use TW, the more concerned i become about maintaining data >>> integrity -and so this issue has boiled to the top of my queue: how can i >>> continue to enjoy the benefits of TW (+ Relink plugin) flexibility, without >>> compromising the integrity of Permalinks? >>> >>> This feels like a deep problem that goes right to core TW architecture- >>> since, as PMario explained in last thread >>> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/kTrAbuneCkA/m/lAsdkriFAgAJ>, >>> tiddler immutability is tied to its Title (so how can Relink even work, i >>> wonder?)- but if i've learned anything here, it is to not underestimate the >>> creative problem-solving ability of this group :-)... SO: >>> >>> From a non-technical perspective, what i'd like to do is have some >>> immutable UID (based on date-time, or maybe date+ a serial number, like >>> yyyy-mm-dd-serialnum) that is used for Permalinks (i.e. shared w/ the >>> outside web that is not Relink-aware), but still have Title field and >>> Relink plugin (and everything else for that matter) work just as it does >>> now, from the TW editor's perspective. >>> >>> Is this a reasonable feature design goal, i wonder? If so, i'd like to >>> do what i can to help make it happen! >>> >>> /walt >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/246e8db5-83f6-4cdf-8607-0f2da672b1e8n%40googlegroups.com.
