Oh good Lord no, this isn't meant for system tiddlers. That's something that would need preventing (i.e. make that button unavailable for system tiddlers,) which should be ridiculously easy to do.
If one is going to need permalinks for external access to system tiddlers in some hosted TiddlyWiki, old-fashioned perma-links should do. To me, system tiddlers are no different than system DLL's in an operating system. Once named, don't fiddle with the name. On Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 5:55:14 AM UTC-3 PMario wrote: > Hmmm, > I think, that's not very practical. As soon as you want to link to a TW > shadow tiddler, you create a clone as a side effect. > > IMO linking needs to be side-effect free! Those edited shadows are > "system" tiddlers. System tiddlers are "user content" and the use always > wins. So those tiddlers will not be updated, if a new core will be used. > > So linking will break the update mechanism > > Just a thought. > -mario > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c0f87e95-b97c-43be-aab8-1272cbe80017n%40googlegroups.com.
