Si,

First, a tiddler incode inside in a JSON tiddler does not have a searchable 
title, this can be helpful sometimes. 

On your first questions it all depends on the application/content or data, 
for example I expect you are saving modified fields as a whole, if you have 
large text fields and added a period the whole text field would be stored 
again.

On your general Question.

   - I can  think of many things that you can do with JSON tiddlers that 
   you can't do with normal tiddlers
   - Tiddler field names have character limitations, not much in the 
   content.
   
On closing I think in your propose history tiddlers it would make sense to 
move them to JSON. Note this is exactly what Monhamads trash plugin does.

   - Lest a search bring up historical tiddler when you done want them.
   - You can then easily export/reimport the history tiddlers as one JSON 
   file and more.

Tones


On Thursday, 13 May 2021 at 01:11:29 UTC+10 si wrote:

> This question stems from a post I made here 
> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/60IxH2QoBDY/m/kYWGzpIRBgAJ>, 
> but I'm also curious about the more general question so I thought I'd make 
> a separate post.
>
> *Specific case:*
>
> My specific case that triggered this question was that I created a button 
> to store "history" for particular tiddlers. The button essentially creates 
> a clone of the current tiddler with the title 
> <currentTiddler>/history/<timestamp>. Since I anticipate creating a lot 
> of "history-tiddlers", it occurred to me that another approach would be to 
> just store all the history data for a particular tiddler in a single JSON 
> tiddler.
>
> This feels a little neater, but more specifically I wondered if there were 
> any clear advantages to either approach? Will storing all history for a 
> tiddler in a single JSON tiddler be less of a drain on performance than 
> using lots of individual tiddlers?
>
> *General question:*
>
> I can't think of anything that you can do with JSON tiddlers that you 
> can't do with normal tiddlers, so I'm curious where it would make more 
> sense to use JSON?
>
> Actually I can think of one thing: tiddler fields have character 
> restrictions. But this doesn't seem like a big deal. It seems outweighed by 
> the fact that we have much better tools for manipulating normal tiddlers.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/491167fb-c448-4594-886c-2e24d885003dn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to