Ciao Mohammad It is an interesting issue.
- I AGREE the base docs are not enough for working everything out. - I DISAGREE that the solution to that problem should be in the main documentation! WHY? Because *IF *you added all possible combination examples it would inflate the main reference site, tiddlywiki.com, to be SO vast it would become unusable. IMO, Jeremy Ruston has done a very good job on documentation. It is true his style is somewhat gnostic :-) The original minimalist! :-) But it is also true that he has ASTUTE BREVITY. IMO this issue should be about SECONDARY documentation. At the moment everything focuses on tw.com. I'm NOT convinced that is the right approach for final practical, fully expanded, documentation. It seems to me that we need more DIFFERENTIATION. AND recognizing better SUPPLEMENTARY documentation that covers specific aspects of TiddlyWiki in more detail would be best. I hope my points make sense, even if you don't agree. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9b4500a8-cf8e-46f5-bdc4-2c8f66ff0269n%40googlegroups.com.
