Mohammad, The strait answer is I believe NO, but,
You may be able to create an additional macro, that uses the macrocall widget to convert the position to a named parameter. However this likely reintroduces the same problem, being able to provide parameters values from difference sources such as variables and transclusions etc... I think what you ask for would be a nice addition to the macrocall widget. Even if a new variable containing all prams needed to be processed within the macro. ie each named parameter is passed and a separate string containing all parameters delimited in some way, perhaps as [[titles]]. Such a mechanism would also help concatenation methods and more. For example providing a macro a set of keyword=value or keyword:value pairs which the macro can parse. I will continue to think about this Tones On Monday, 31 May 2021 at 11:35:57 UTC+10 Mohamed Amin wrote: > Hi, > > if I've the following macro: > \define myMacro(par1:"A" par2:"B" par3:"C") > $par1$-$par2$-$par3$ > \end > I can call it using the short syntax <<myMacro XY>> to get the output = > XY-B-C without specify the parameter names (only the position). > > But if I use <$macrocall> widget with the same way <$macrocall > $name="myMacro" XY /> it seems not working. any idea how to make this > work? > > My use case, > I've some macro names as "variables", they are not identical but are the > same category (so their parameter names are different). > My option now is to re-name all parameters to be the same, but I want to > check first if there is way . > > > Thanks in advance > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/547850d6-65f7-462d-aa68-6ce1a3257e2cn%40googlegroups.com.
