ha Ha "bad sMellers," Totally agree, I am one of them, not to mention typos
Seriously being able to edit the top post was a great way of summarising the results that come out in the thread. A Simple standard to update the top post when a question is answered, and the answer etc... would add great value. On discourse, Its A chat not likely to have longer more serious content, thus fragmented and harder to read. Has its place but in my mode not as a replacement to Git hub. I still hole a light for Yammer, but I do not want to waste my time explaining why if few people even try it. As a knowledge curator it would be ideal. Many little groups and blogs can be created with the owners extracting links and even build collaborative documents. Its only gap was code blocks. Tones \ On Monday, 7 June 2021 at 22:28:09 UTC+10 TiddlyTweeter wrote: > [email protected] wrote: > >> Jeremy just so you are aware, the issues with posting via the web >>> interface go beyond just difficulty in making monospaced blocks. >>> >> > IF you ONLY use this GG though EMAIL then you WON'T know what got LOST > recently ... (and other functions too ...) > > - CODE sections > - Ability to PRIVATELY REPLY to posters > - Ability to RE-EDIT for spelling errors (a serious disaster for bad > sMellers, of which there are many, including me) > > Just observations > TT > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f902ed70-466a-486a-94d3-c44b847f8f36n%40googlegroups.com.
