Hi @Télumire, Can you explain a bit more by what you mean regarding fields? Like do you mean having a form you fill out that then creates a formatted tiddler or something else?
Right now I drag the highlighted url text into my TiddlyWiki for an import, renaming it before I hit import. And then I click on the imported tiddler link and edit it with the proper tag(s) and description/notes/explanation. Thanks for your initial idea and hopefully your reply :) DM On Tuesday, June 22, 2021 at 3:03:36 PM UTC-4 Télumire wrote: > Hi @Victor, > > Personally, I create a tiddler for each bookmark. When I have several > similar urls to save, for example a list of online IDE, then I create only > one tiddler for the list. This way it reduces clutter but still allows me > to tag and filter each link. > > Here's my wiki : vaforis.github.io > > Currently it has over 600 tiddlers and I didn't notice any lags. Each > tiddler has a link and a quick description of the url. > I created it a while ago, so this is not very efficient .. if I wanted to > redo it, I'd use fields to set the content and use a template to display > the content, it would probably shave off quite a bit of space. > > Le mar. 22 juin 2021 à 16:37, Victor Dorneanu <cyn...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> > *If you are asking if the above approach (an individual tiddler per >> link with summary pages) is better or worse than a manual page with a bunch >> of links you update as you find them then I would say, based on >> consideration for the workflow involved, quality of life interaction/steps, >> and also the fact that many users here have stated they have massive >> tiddlywiki's with little performance hit, that I would stick with what you >> have and not be too concern with the size.* >> >> That's exactly what I'm asking for. I think it should concern to much >> about the size. >> >> > *But if i consider these resources important enough to hold a place in >> my Digital Garden (having presumably read or at least skimmed the >> articles), then i typically have something more to say about them.* >> >> Exactly! I also use to annotate my bookmarks; at least I have a small >> note there. Just having a link there has no value for me. >> >> > *In light of your recent article on Note Taking in 2021 >> <http://blog.dornea.nu/2021/06/13/note-taking-in-2021/> (excellent piece, >> b/t/w, what really set my own wheels turning >> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/vlAZ_K4K63o>, along with a good >> few others), i don't guess i'm telling you anything new, Victor... But >> anyway: thanks again for sparking a bit more introspection into this >> process i too often run, but still don't think critically enough about!* >> >> Thank you very much! I'm planning to add more posts regarding my >> workflow. >> On Tuesday, June 22, 2021 at 3:11:11 PM UTC+2 ludwa6 wrote: >> >>> Hey @Victor: That's a good question- simple, but profound- one that all >>> of us here must answer for ourselves some non-zero number of times most >>> days. >>> >>> The answer to this for me is a followup Q: What version of my future >>> self (i.e. in what context) do i imagine would find this resource to be >>> most useful? >>> If the answer to that Q comes to me easily enough, then tiddler content >>> -description, crossref link(s), tag(s)- then the NoteMaking tends to flow >>> quite naturally. >>> >>> If OTOH it does not... Well then i've got yet another note w/ a set of >>> links that i may very likely never bother to click. Take for example your >>> note on 4-Day Work Week <https://brainfck.org/#The%204-day%20workweek>, >>> which links to one canonical definition from Wikipedia, and two articles on >>> the topic that i know nothing about beyond the title, where it was >>> published, and possibly when (date is URL-encoded on one link, but not on >>> the other). If i'm only interested in the simplest form of NoteTaking >>> -i.e. resource curation, the Librarian role- then maybe that serves the >>> need. But if i consider these resources important enough to hold a place >>> in my Digital Garden (having presumably read or at least skimmed the >>> articles), then i typically have something more to say about them. >>> >>> In light of your recent article on Note Taking in 2021 >>> <https://brainfck.org/#The%204-day%20workweek> (excellent piece, b/t/w, >>> what really set my own wheels turning >>> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/vlAZ_K4K63o>, along with a >>> good few others), i don't guess i'm telling you anything new, Victor... But >>> anyway: thanks again for sparking a bit more introspection into this >>> process i too often run, but still don't think critically enough about! >>> >>> /walt >>> >>> On Tuesday, June 22, 2021 at 11:22:29 AM UTC+1 Victor Dorneanu wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> since I was not able to find such a thread, I've decided to create a >>>> new one. I just want to read your opinions when it's better to just have >>>> links (inside a tiddler) and when one should create tiddlers for them (as >>>> bookmarks). >>>> >>>> I'll try to describe my current problem. At the moment I use this >>>> Bookmarks plugin >>>> <https://brainfck.org/#%24%3A%2Fplugins%2Finmysocks%2FBookmarks> to >>>> organize my bookmarks. Examples: >>>> >>>> - List of bookmarks for Tiddlywiki >>>> <https://brainfck.org/#Tiddlywiki> >>>> - List of bookmarks for Golang <https://brainfck.org/#Golang> >>>> >>>> As I discover more sites/resources I'd add them as a bookmark and >>>> they'll be automatically listed on those pages. However, doing so will >>>> also >>>> increase the size of my Tiddlywiki instance. I use nodeJS and call >>>> *tiddlywiki >>>> tw5 --build index *to build one single html size which then get's >>>> uploaded to AWS S3. >>>> >>>> Now I do know it's better to have single tiddlers for each bookmark >>>> since you can tag them, filter them and make them available in different >>>> locations (one bookmark could also be listed in multiple categories: e.g. >>>> Tiddlywiki *and *Golang). But I was thinking adding just links to a >>>> single tiddler (like this tiddler >>>> <https://brainfck.org/#The%204-day%20workweek>) might be a better >>>> approach. >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance for your input and time. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Victor >>>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "TiddlyWiki" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to tiddlywiki+...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b64d2607-9ec3-40d6-af7f-3571a9e1a986n%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b64d2607-9ec3-40d6-af7f-3571a9e1a986n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a1e041d6-6270-4957-ad9a-62b77201cd18n%40googlegroups.com.
