So that's why I couldn't post a reply, you had just deleted your post! Here 
is what I was replying: 

Hi springer,

1. I don't know if I updated the teaser version, but in the main file I am 
tinkering with, selecting text and clicking the ted button does wrap the 
text.

2. I literally just posted a question about having ted (which I am planning 
to call Subsume) be another option the excise button dropdown. Then saw 
your post.

3. I agree that is cleaner in EDIT to have it be double angle brackets. But 
that forces double spacing, and I think it is much cleaner and flexible in 
VIEW mode to allow users to have them singlespaced. And I doubt Jeremy 
would allow tweaking to macros to eliminate the <p> that is the culprit 
here. It would not be backwards compatible and could cause all kinds of 
problems. I could have a second button to render it as double angle 
brackets , I suppose. You CAN currently invoke it with  double angle 
brackets by typing it.

Dave

On Wednesday, July 14, 2021 at 8:29:35 AM UTC-5 springer wrote:

> David,
>
> I'm so sorry to have just replied on your OTHER thread, requesting this 
> very development, before reading this one! I'll go delete that, and put the 
> guts of that message below...
>
> I'm thinking of a variant on "excise selected text into a new tiddler" 
> that could take selected text, port it to a new tiddler (prompting for 
> title, or defaulting to first line), and leave a corresponding details 
> macro neatly in place of where the excised text is? This would be 
> tremendously helpful in editing "overgrown" tiddlers (or paragraph 
> sequences pasted in from elsewhere) and bringing a project closer to the 
> ideal of tiddlers-as-smallest-useful-bits.
>
> For what it's worth, I'm with Saq in hoping to invoke it with <<det 
> "Component Idea">> -- much better for readability, sharing with newbies, 
> etc., and would hope for the editor button to work that way as well.
>
> I wish I had time to tinker with these things myself so that I could offer 
> tribute in the form of useful work, rather than chiming in as a backseat 
> driver!
>
> -Springer
>
> On Wednesday, July 14, 2021 at 9:19:47 AM UTC-4 David Gifford wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> Yesterday I teased a modest macro that has the capability of turning 
>> TiddlyWiki into an outliner. 
>> https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/gCp5ONBxFXg (first half)
>>
>> I am thinking about packaging it as a plugin called Subsume, but one item 
>> seems to call for attention.
>>
>> If I could add this macro as a new option for the excise dropdown, not as 
>> a macro but as a macrocall, that would allow users to excise text and turn 
>> it into a link/slider in the present tiddler instead of transcluding it or 
>> linking it.
>>
>> But two things hold me back:
>> 1. After playing with the excise dropdown tiddler for a while I am still 
>> not sure how it works or how to add another dropdown option to it.
>> 2. Even if I knew how to do that, this would mean that my plugin would 
>> need to change some core tiddlers. And this would make it un-future-proof.
>>
>> What chance is there of eventually having the excise dropdown be as easy 
>> to add options to via tags, as, say, the pagecontrol buttons and sidebar 
>> tabs? Maybe my macrocall is not the only way people might want to customize 
>> excising.
>>
>> And, does anyone know how to tweak the excise set of tiddlers as it 
>> stands so that I could insert a named macrocall of the tiddler instead of a 
>> transclusion, macro or link?
>>
>> (In case any of you are wondering, I need macrocall instead of a normal 
>> macro to avoid the <p> that causes extra spacing above and below macros)
>>
>> Blessings, Dave
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ae227b97-89c7-4a8a-817d-7abd3ba1a42fn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to