Mario, I don't think the thread you linked is relevant. I'm talking about field *names*, not field values. And I don't see how it would break backwards compatibility with 5.1.x, because 5.1.x didn't allow *any* spaces in field names.
If I'm misunderstanding, please correct me (and can you link the discussions on GitHub?). On Wednesday, August 18, 2021 at 3:57:26 PM UTC-5 PMario wrote: > On Wednesday, August 18, 2021 at 10:38:29 PM UTC+2 Soren Bjornstad wrote: > >> I'll preface this by saying this probably belongs in a GitHub issue, and >> I'll be happy to create one over there if we want one. But wanted to get >> people's thoughts first, and ASAP because now is our last chance to do this >> without breaking backwards compatibility (once 5.2.0 is released, it would >> be pretty hard to change). >> > > I think this won't happen because of backwards compatibility with 5.1.x. > There have been some discussions on github already. The conclusion was, we > keep the status quo and live with it. > > There has been a discussion recently, where a user needed to be able to > add whitespace as needed. And the description of the usecase made sense. So > there are usecases. ... See: > https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/Cjy074MsfzM > > -mario > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6a244024-a0e2-4ff4-a855-cd72c190672en%40googlegroups.com.
