I might be proven wrong, but my experience is that it's a 1:1 relationship between the checkbox and a storage location, there's not a way to directly have multiple checkboxes change a list per-se. A couple of ideas though:
- You could use the same temp tiddler and use individual fields for your possible values, that might make it easier to collect the values for later processing. - There are now "checkactions" and "uncheck actions" associated with the widget. So, if you wanted to, you could force the checkboxes to run a listops routine to add-subtract values from a list. This would be the closest to what your expecations are, but it might not actually be the most efficient. On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 8:07:40 AM UTC-4 TW Tones wrote: > jkm > > Have you looked at the select widget, it also has a multiple option. > > Tones > > On Thursday, 26 August 2021 at 21:26:28 UTC+10 [email protected] wrote: > >> I am able to use the radio widget to control my list filter. Now I would >> like to use checkboxes in a multi-select manner (e.g., include any checked >> keywords: Info, fix, Procedure). However, I haven't seen an example of >> this yet. My attempt >> >> ... >> <td>''KBA Type:''  >> <$checkbox tiddler="$:/temp/ktype" >> value="Procedure"> Procedure</$checkbox>  >> <$checkbox tiddler="$:/temp/ktype" >> value="Info"> Info</$checkbox>  >> <$checkbox tiddler="$:/temp/ktype" >> value="Fix"> Fix</$checkbox>  >> </td> >> ... >> <$list filter="[tag[KBA]ktype{$:/temp/ktype}]"> >> >> I think I expected all selected items to be handled in the same temp >> tiddler but maybe I'm overwriting it each time I check/uncheck. Do I need >> to create a temp tiddler for each and work out the list filter logic >> manually in a sequence of separate runs? >> >> Not sure it's relevant, but I will be wanting to use this to filter on >> values in a field. That field may contain a single string or list of >> strings (examples: *Info *or *Fix Procedure* or *Fix Info*). Ultimately >> I would like to derive the list of checkboxes from a field within all >> tiddlers with a specific tag. Like a "tag" based search engine except they >> are not TW tags, they are just tags derived from the tiddler field. But, >> baby steps (assuming it's possible/practical). >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7081ee66-611b-496e-aace-337fad9addbbn%40googlegroups.com.
