Charlie:

Perhaps some of the protection you are looking for can be had via the 
frequent saves of a tiddler file to Dropbox?
Unless things have changed since I last used it, that would provide a 
rolling 30 day cache that could be used to recover losses.

Cheers,
Hans


On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 11:24:00 AM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:

> Well, by obfuscation, I see that as a catch-all word to also mean 
> abstraction, encapsulation, and whatever other little design thingies so 
> that the end result doesn't look anything like TiddlyWiki any more.
>
> So a user will have to work very hard to get into trouble.
>
> Your Plan B is my Plan A, and your Plan A is my plan Z.  In my mind, folk 
> who are busy with their missions don't need to be distracted by technical 
> stuff needed to be kept in mind.  The best kind of software is the kind 
> that doesn't need any user guide other than, maybe, something concise that 
> lets them know how the software supports them, their goals, their 
> processes.  I prefer that users trust that software they work with is 
> robust/resilient/etc. and doesn't ever waste their time by allowing 
> something to happen that can waste their time.  Well, within reason.  That 
> find balance of cost/benefit.
>
> But I do suffer easily from both sensory and cognitive overload, and so 
> heavily do these influence my design philosophies.
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 6:07:42 AM UTC-3 PMario wrote:
>
>> On Monday, September 6, 2021 at 3:01:25 AM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> No worries.  I'll train my thoughts on obfuscation, risk-mitigation 
>>> design/strategies, and automated monitoring/repairing processes.
>>>
>>
>> IMO obfuscation is wasting time, other than removing the buttons, that 
>> are not needed. Which I would define as "modifying the UI according to the 
>> usecase" ;)
>>
>> With nodejs you should be able to establish a "batch process" that runs 
>> once a day and checks, if some important shadow tiddlers have been 
>> overwritten. I would consider this as "Plan B".
>>
>> Plan A - IMO the easiest way would be to trust your users and tell them 
>> what's going on, and what's important. Having Plan B will then only be 
>> needed if someone changes something by accident. 
>>
>> just a thought
>> mario
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/32d6206c-085b-4f5a-a0ea-1e0269e9eda9n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to