Hi Soren,
Do you have an empty Tiddly Zettelkasten that we could download and use?

On Thursday, 23 September 2021 at 00:51:25 UTC+8 Soren Bjornstad wrote:

> The Zettelkasten edition I talked about wanting to get together is public 
> now. It's still alpha-ish, but in much better shape than the version I 
> published here. You can find a link and continue discussion of it on this 
> thread:
>
>
> https://talk.tiddlywiki.org/t/introducing-tzk-tiddlyzettelkasten-edition/834
>
> On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 12:51:14 PM UTC-5 Soren Bjornstad wrote:
>
>> Probably did, but right now that one is more or less just <<list-links 
>> "[[OpenQuestion]backlinks[]]">> -- there's no special functionality for 
>> selecting questions out of the tiddlers. That's something I'd like to 
>> improve in the future.
>>
>> On Monday, June 28, 2021 at 12:12:30 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any chance your filter missed the OpenQuestions tiddler as well?
>>>
>>> On Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 11:55:35 AM UTC-4 Soren Bjornstad wrote:
>>>
>>>> Looks like my filter missed the TODO tiddler, which should contain:
>>>>
>>>> \define todore() \[\[TODO\]\]:
>>>> \define splitre() [\.\?!]
>>>>
>>>> To add a TODO item to this list, simply link to [[TODO]].
>>>>
>>>> <dl>
>>>> <$list filter="[[TODO]backlinks[]] -[[TODO]]" variable=outer>
>>>>   <$list 
>>>> filter="[<outer>get[text]splitregexp<todore>last[]splitregexp<splitre>first[]]"
>>>>  
>>>> variable=inner>
>>>>   <dt><$link to=<<outer>>/></dt>
>>>> <dd>''TODO:'' <<inner>>.</dd>
>>>> </$list>
>>>> </$list>
>>>> </dl>
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 10:23:28 AM UTC-5 ludwa6 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Good to know, Soren, but first i have to get the basics under control, 
>>>>> like: TODO items!  
>>>>>
>>>>> About that, you say in your video at 28'47" 
>>>>> <https://youtu.be/GjpjE5pMZMI?t=1727> : "*Anywhere that i write the 
>>>>> word todo in square brackets, so link to the tiddler todo, gets 
>>>>> automatically pulled in here"* -here being presumably TODO tab of 
>>>>> "Write" feature, since that is the context.  I have tried this a number 
>>>>> of 
>>>>> ways -with square brackets of both types: single (would have to be by 
>>>>> some 
>>>>> magic i don't see, but since you didn't say "DOUBLE"...) and double 
>>>>> (creating a missing tiddler, which i then activated, tagged "Stub"), 
>>>>> whether as TODO uppercase or lower... Nothing shows up as expected in 
>>>>> that 
>>>>> tab, at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what am i missing here, i wonder?
>>>>>
>>>>> /walt
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 3:31:11 PM UTC+1 Soren Bjornstad wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, to convert a single-file wiki to Node.js, all you need is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> tiddlywiki --load path/to/single/file.html --savewikifolder 
>>>>>> path/to/output/folder
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You could even do this as a first step in the script above, if you 
>>>>>> wanted to normally edit in single-file mode but use the automated build.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 9:02:28 AM UTC-5 ludwa6 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank-you Soren, but to be clear: I'm working in single-file mode, 
>>>>>>> since i was unable to find a way to convert your file to node.js, 
>>>>>>> though 
>>>>>>> that would probably make for a more elegant solution [*]... But the 
>>>>>>> "manual" method you propose below (with slight adaptation, see below) 
>>>>>>> is 
>>>>>>> sufficiently well-automated, it makes my workflow relatively painless, 
>>>>>>> as 
>>>>>>> follows:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    1. In TiddlyDesktop (where i am managing a fair mitt-full of TW5 
>>>>>>>    instances), finish my days edits with a review to ensure tag 
>>>>>>> "Public" is on 
>>>>>>>    all the right tiddlers, and none other;
>>>>>>>    2. In $:/AdvancedSearch, run the filter-  
>>>>>>>    [tag[Public]!is[system]]  -and upload the result set as .json, to...
>>>>>>>    3. Drag & drop that .json file into the my local PUBLIC instance 
>>>>>>>    (subset of the above), which is they synced to...
>>>>>>>    4. My github.io repo <https://ludwa6.github.io/> : pull from 
>>>>>>>    there (just to ensure there are no conflicting edits), then 
>>>>>>>    commit/comment/push changes online.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NB: I'm using Atom text editor (on Mac, b/t/w, not Windows) for the 
>>>>>>> last step, just because i like its change management workflow, but 
>>>>>>> there's 
>>>>>>> a desktop app for Github that is probably the most intuitive GuI app 
>>>>>>> for 
>>>>>>> this purpose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [*] As to that more elegant solution: if it were a node.js instance 
>>>>>>> i had in github, then i can see how it might be easier to manage a 
>>>>>>> dataflow 
>>>>>>> based on individual tiddlers, instead of one big .html file -especially 
>>>>>>> if 
>>>>>>> others were to be engaged in collaborative editing (via Github Pull 
>>>>>>> Request)... But that's a bridge too far for me to even think about at 
>>>>>>> this 
>>>>>>> point.  Gotta play with this for a while first IMCST (In My Copious 
>>>>>>> Spare 
>>>>>>> Time -ha!), in the hope that it will at some point save me more time 
>>>>>>> than 
>>>>>>> it costs me to manage it -the most important question to ask of any 
>>>>>>> database app, i guess, yes?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /walt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 1:35:05 PM UTC+1 Soren Bjornstad wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> A manual option would be to go to $:/AdvancedSearch, type in the 
>>>>>>>> filter you want to export (e.g., [tag[Public]] [is[system]]), use the 
>>>>>>>> export button to the right of the search box to export as JSON, and 
>>>>>>>> then 
>>>>>>>> import that JSON file into a fresh empty.html and publish that HTML 
>>>>>>>> file.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That said, since you are already using Node.js, automating this 
>>>>>>>> with "command-line voodoo" isn't that hard, and then it will do 
>>>>>>>> everything 
>>>>>>>> for you with one command, without a chance of making mistakes. Here's 
>>>>>>>> a 
>>>>>>>> simplified version of what I use. I'm guessing you're using Windows, 
>>>>>>>> but if 
>>>>>>>> so and you have github.io set up, you probably already have Git 
>>>>>>>> for Windows installed, which will be enough to run a Bash script like 
>>>>>>>> the 
>>>>>>>> one below. Mac/Linux will run this script out of the box....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f4f33141-1ca3-4e4d-b252-109946951142n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to