Good stuff ! In the last couple of hours, the zen of making soup and then totally pigging out ... an alternative approach came to mind.
Involves a little bit more code, and fun brain-age game. Serving up alternative later, I think. On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 7:30:54 PM UTC-3 David wrote: > I searched this forum and found the upgrade post, and the handy tool! > > That worked. And now I can use your code. Thanks! > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 5:33:30 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote: > >> Oh poop, TW versions. I am not up and up on the differences between >> versions, but I'm guessing that "filter" operand is the culprit. >> >> You might want to consider upgrading your TiddlyWiki to the latest >> version (keeping a backup of your older version, of course.) >> >> Well worth it, I think, to get to the newest version. Me thinks a good >> number of folk really burned the midnight oil to create the latest. >> >> All of that said, if you must stay with 5.1.21 for any reason, drop a >> note as such here. I'm sure some enterprising person can come up with a >> right sweet alternative. >> >> On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 6:08:29 PM UTC-3 David wrote: >> >>> cj, >>> >>> Thanks so much for piddling with it. >>> >>> The reason I didn't include import type code was that I thought I was >>> missing asimple filter operator or something like that. >>> >>> Second, I think thi sis a really cool thing. I'd love to explore using >>> json as my datasource more. many more options than just the simple >>> dictionary list. >>> >>> Third, the code you provided did not work in my own TW, but like you >>> instructed, it worked on tw.com properly. Does your code use any new >>> features? My version is *5.1.21* and I've never had to update it >>> before. >>> >>> Thanks so much! >>> >>> On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:29:32 PM UTC-4 [email protected] >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Man, it would have saved me a whole bunch of time if you had provided >>>> tiddlers for this so folk don't have to build everything from scratch. >>>> >>>> Regardless, that was a fun exercise !!! >>>> >>>> Coding fun attached. Download and drag into TiddlyWiki.com for import >>>> and your analysis. (One "Road Eats" tiddler with the data, one "Test >>>> Thingy" tiddler with the filtering code.) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 3:51:37 PM UTC-3 David wrote: >>>> >>>>> I have a simple data tiddler which is my data source for a tiddler >>>>> that displays it as checkboxes and all that is working as it should. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The display tiddler probably uses code I got off the TW site, I'm >>>>> sure.... >>>>> >>>>> <$tiddler tiddler="Road Eats"> >>>>> <$list filter="[all[current]indexes[]sort[]]" variable=item> >>>>> <$checkbox index=<<item>> checked="1" unchecked="0"/> <<item>><br/> >>>>> </$list> >>>>> </$tiddler> >>>>> >>>>> And then that data tiddler is simple, like so.... >>>>> >>>>> Hardee's: 0 >>>>> Waffle House: 0 >>>>> Captain D's: 0 >>>>> Jack in the Box: 0 >>>>> >>>>> What I'm interested in doing is putting another list of checkboxes >>>>> above the existing one. The top/new one should just show those that are >>>>> checked (i.e. has a value of 1 in the data tiddler. >>>>> >>>>> I imagine that the same code would be used, but just with an extra >>>>> param in the filter attribute, right? I searched through the filter >>>>> operators, but couldn't find it. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1bf2c068-01cc-4ed8-a455-c3d82c4f2a57n%40googlegroups.com.
