And... Here's a shot of what it looks like on TW. When I was testing at work this afternoon, the circles were less oval, and in a row.
[image: TWsite test.png] On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 8:25:13 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: > I thought the tids might help > > On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 8:17:33 PM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote: > >> Oh, column vs row. >> >> Although the blank lines make your work more readable, I'm thinking one >> of those is causing a carriage return. >> >> *And* your macro is missing parentheses: >> >> \define lfdots*()* >> >> Otherwise, very cool. >> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 11:09:20 PM UTC-4 [email protected] >> wrote: >> >>> oh, and it works fine on tiddlywiki.com with my tweaks (except that the >>> dots are in a column not a row as before) >>> >>> And I see I left out the () after the definition - but still no >>> difference >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 8:07:13 PM UTC-7 [email protected] >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Everything worked on Tiddlywiki, but on my wiki, after my tweaks, no >>>> good/no bueno/dim da (that last one is Welsh) >>>> >>>> My tweaks to the code: >>>> >>>> \define lfdots >>>> >>>> <$list filter="[{!!colors}split[,]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[abr],[gold]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[bgn],[teal]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[blk],[black]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[blu],[blue]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[brn],[brown]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[cyn],[cyan]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[grn],[limegreen]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[gry],[gray]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[mag],[magenta]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[org],[orange]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[ppl],[purple]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[rbn],[sienna]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[red],[red]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[tny],[burlywood]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[wht],[white]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[ygn],[yellowgreen]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[yel],[yellow]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[pnk],[pink]] >>>> +[search-replace:i[lbl],[skyblue]] >>>> "> >>>> >>>> <$vars thisStyle={{{ [[min-height:20px;width:20px;background-color:]] >>>> [<currentTiddler>] [[;border-radius:50%;display:inline-block;border:3px >>>> solid black;]] +[join[]] }}}> >>>> <span style={{{ [<thisStyle>] }}}> </span> >>>> >>>> </$vars> >>>> >>>> </$list> >>>> \end >>>> >>>> >>>> - number of doesn't seem to matter as long as there's one - >>>> on tiddlywiki.com >>>> - I realize that if I use a delimiter in the split, I can have >>>> different length parameters, and therefore dont need abbreviations or >>>> the >>>> search-replace commands; I'm using them at the moment for habit's sake >>>> >>>> So when I create the macro definition tiddler, when I saved it before, >>>> it looked empty, but now it looks like this: >>>> >>>> [image: lfdots Macro tid.png] >>>> >>>> and the test tid, with the text <<lfdots>> (lfdots for large field >>>> dots, as opposed to sddots = small defined dots) looks like this: >>>> >>>> [image: lfdots test.png] >>>> >>>> So what did I do wrong? I've been over and over for typos, but not >>>> seeing it. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 1:27:48 PM UTC-7 [email protected] >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You got it. Well, I could be out to lunch. Proof is always in the >>>>> pudding. >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 3:38:44 PM UTC-4 [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So much awesomeness! >>>>>> >>>>>> Okay, so I see now it's not my classes, but regular html color names. >>>>>> If I want #478AE2, how do I specify that? For some reason, I think >>>>>> [#478AE2] isn't right - or am I wrong? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:34 PM Charlie Veniot <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> And I hybrid, for the giggles: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> \define beDotted3(likeThis) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <$list filter="[[$likeThis$]!is[blank]] [{!!colorway}] +[first[]] >>>>>>> +[split[]] +[search-replace:i[y],[yellow]] >>>>>>> +[search-replace:i[r],[red]]"> >>>>>>> <$vars thisStyle={{{ >>>>>>> [[min-height:25px;width:25px;background-color:]] [<currentTiddler>] >>>>>>> [[;border-radius:50%;display:inlin-block;border:3px solid black;]] >>>>>>> +[join[]] }}}> >>>>>>> <span style={{{ [<thisStyle>] }}}> </span> >>>>>>> </$vars> >>>>>>> </$list> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> \end >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 3:21:03 PM UTC-4 Charlie Veniot >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If you had as standard the use of a "colorway" field in your >>>>>>>> tiddlers, then the macro doesn't need any parameter. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe something like this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> \define beDotted2( ) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <$list filter="[{!!colorway}split[]] >>>>>>>> +[search-replace:i[y],[yellow]] +[search-replace:i[r],[red]]"> >>>>>>>> <$vars thisStyle={{{ >>>>>>>> [[min-height:25px;width:25px;background-color:]] [<currentTiddler>] >>>>>>>> [[;border-radius:50%;display:inlin-block;border:3px solid black;]] >>>>>>>> +[join[]] }}}> >>>>>>>> <span style={{{ [<thisStyle>] }}}> </span> >>>>>>>> </$vars> >>>>>>>> </$list> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> \end >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <<beDotted2>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-4 >>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If I'm understanding you right, I think currentTiddler is the >>>>>>>>> right thing. As an example: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> {{!!colorway}} >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ! The Title of the Thing and the Stuff >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> where colorway is the field with the long PITA spans. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Using your macro, it would just be >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <<beDotted "YYYYRRR">> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ! The Title of the Thing and the Stuff >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and I could get rid of the colorway field altogether >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> or maybe do something like this? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <<beDotted {{!!colors}}>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:50 AM Charlie Veniot <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Okay. Just need to know what the meaty part should be. (i.e., >>>>>>>>>> what should be where the "<<currentTiddler>>" is?) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> \define beDotted( likeThis ) >>>>>>>>>> <$list filter="[[$likeThis$]split[]]"> >>>>>>>>>> <<currentTiddler>> >>>>>>>>>> </$list> >>>>>>>>>> \end >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <<beDotted "YYYYRRR">> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 2:42:30 PM UTC-4 Charlie Veniot >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For sure a macro could do that. Give me a few minutes. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 2:33:00 PM UTC-4 >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, sorry - I forgot some details: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to be able to ID colors as a visual example easily >>>>>>>>>>>> - they don't have to be dots. >>>>>>>>>>>> If I had my druthers, I'd love to have some sort of macro where >>>>>>>>>>>> I pass in something like "YYYYYRWG" and get the above or similar. >>>>>>>>>>>> Could a >>>>>>>>>>>> macro do that? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 11:29:48 AM UTC-7 >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I created some classes to created colored dots, so that I can >>>>>>>>>>>>> list specific colors for a project. I call them colorways. An >>>>>>>>>>>>> example : >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Annotation 2021-11-30 112413.png] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The issue is that coding them is a pita. For example, the code >>>>>>>>>>>>> for the above is: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <span class= "cwd ylw"></span><span class= "cwd >>>>>>>>>>>>> ylw"></span><span class= "cwd ylw"></span><span class= "cwd >>>>>>>>>>>>> ylw"></span><span class= "cwd ylw"></span><span class= "cwd >>>>>>>>>>>>> red"></span><span class= "cwd wht"></span><span class= "cwd >>>>>>>>>>>>> grn"></span> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> where >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - cwd is a class that creates colorway dots >>>>>>>>>>>>> - ylw (and red, wht, grn) is a class that makes the dot >>>>>>>>>>>>> yellow >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone think of an easier way to do this? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e21ed25e-345b-4715-bde5-42bb72a21dc1n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e21ed25e-345b-4715-bde5-42bb72a21dc1n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> >>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/35b54060-fc6c-4ca6-a9b0-fa925e2fdd97n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/35b54060-fc6c-4ca6-a9b0-fa925e2fdd97n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e0d42596-af6d-4d84-a2db-df8f04b94938n%40googlegroups.com.
