The feature in Talk to include copies from here is a double edged sword; On 
the one hand it might incentivize to go over here if there's an interesting 
discussion that one feels the urge to participate in. But on the other 
hand, one gets the information from here without having to come here, so 
why bother going here...?

I inclining towards the latter, i.e it is getting rarer and rarer that I 
reply to posts here on GG. It's just more fun in Talk... hearts and badges 
and stuff, and easy to edit posts,  and overall more action in Talk. But it 
bothers me that there may be people here in GG who think "this is it" - 
that the community is not very active and that it is not sure one gets a 
quick reply. 

The Talk forum has proven itself superior in many regards and it is IMO 
time to not only remove the "experimental" reference but to officially make 
it the *primary* discussion forum for the community because we risk giving 
the wrong impression of the community and the project otherwise.

<:-)

On Sunday, January 16, 2022 at 9:27:19 AM UTC+1 Mat wrote:

> Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
>> I plan to update tiddlywiki.com to link to talk.tiddlywiki.org shortly, 
>> and I think that will be the point where it stops being an experiment.
>
>
> IMO the time is ripe! :-) I think newcomers post here without realizing 
> that this GG is now a "subset" of talk. And they may mistakenly believe the 
> community is less active than it really is.
>
> Other than then removing the word "experimental" from the GG forum header 
> here, I would also propose to modify that header message to mention that 
> "Any posts made here in Google groups also appear as copies in 
> talk.tiddlywiki.org" or some such.
>
> <:-) 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/6d138cb2-462d-49ca-b624-0e66bad20173n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to