Yeah, I can't participate in a discussion thread that starts going outside of the original focus, the very thing being discussed.
You might as well start here a sub-thread related to what you had for breakfast this morning. Same thing. I can't process something that has spilled outside of the very thing I was focused on. Cognitive overload and overstimulation because of too many things getting intermixed with something I was hoping to keep hyperfocused. This is now your thread to generally discuss all things related to interwiki communication and multi-user wikis. I have to get out of this one. Too big. Too many instant intertwingled things in my head creating thread scope creep. I'll move to other existing/new threads to continue focused discussion somewhere else. On Saturday, February 26, 2022 at 2:50:04 PM UTC-4 Mat wrote: > @cj.v - thank you for sharing your stuff. > @Jed - thank you for your added information. It is totally relevant in the > context and I was thinking the same thing. > @cj.v - focus back to you. This is, of course, a discussion forum. Another > option is to publish stuff in a wiki. But I hope you write more about the > OP here so you and others can contribute on the matter because it is a > topic I'm very interested in. > > <:-) > > > On Saturday, February 26, 2022 at 5:21:44 PM UTC+1 [email protected] > wrote: > >> Cool, but I'm getting a soupçon of desire to shut down the sharing of the >> stuff I'm doing. I get the feeling I've broken some kind of weird taboo, >> and there is a desire to use my OP as an opportunity to promote/advertise >> somebody else's work (and now somebody else's talents) when I didn't >> address any of that in the OP. If you're not interested at all in what I"m >> doing, why chime in? >> >> It is all a little bit strange to me. >> >> I'm just sharing something I find fun and interesting, the results of my >> own learning and research. What's with all of the noise? >> >> >> >> On Saturday, February 26, 2022 at 11:44:36 AM UTC-4 TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >>> [email protected] wrote: >>> >>>> I didn't know about it, and even if I did, I probably wouldn't look at >>>> it until I've gone as far as I can go with my own exploring. (I prefer >>>> learn by doing than studying somebody else's work.) >>> >>> >>> *Kudos on that. *(Though I want to comment that Jed is one of the great >>> TW thinker/programmers. He has not been so live recently, but basically the >>> man has created great work in TW. He spearheaded the TW approach to >>> "Federation". In Bob he provides a superb way to maintain wiki.) >>> >>> Side comment >>> TT >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ba2509f5-152d-4399-9ba1-a3543aa4b54fn%40googlegroups.com.
