Dear FND,

Haven't seen a reaction so far on this question.

But for me it is important because I am still using TW v2.4.3 for this
reason. As soon as there is good justification for the increase in
size I would be happy to upgrade. But so far I am very reluctant.

Thanks very much in advance and with best regards / Ton.

On 31 mrt, 23:19, Ton van Rooijen <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Hello There",
>
> Congratulations with the publication of TW v2.6.0 !
>
> In TW v2.5.0 there was the introduction of jQuery "for future use",
> adding some 20% to the size of an "empty" TW.
> In the meantime we've seen v2.5.1, v2.5.2, v2.5.3 and now v2.6.0 with
> a new, even bigger, version of jQuery.
> Just out of curiosity: is there any use of jQuery in the TW core or in
> plugins by now?
> Or is jQuery still "dead wheight" for future use?
> Hope you don't mind me asking.
>
> Ton van Rooijen
>
> On 18 mrt, 13:39, FND <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > We are pleased to announce the release of TiddlyWiki 2.6.0:
> >      http://www.tiddlywiki.com
>
> > Since there were no bug reports from the beta release, there have been
> > no additional changes.
>
> > This release includes a variety of bugfixes and enhancements. The most
> > obvious changes are:
> > * Added WindowTitle shadow tiddler
> > * Added creator tiddler field
> > * Upgraded to jQuery 1.4.2
>
> > For the full list of changes seehttp://trac.tiddlywiki.org/wiki/History
>
> > Many thanks to all the contributors.
>
> > -- F.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.

Reply via email to