Keeping in mind that I am always about picking the right-by-me tool for the 
job at hand. 

TiddlyWiki is my go-to for getting intertwingularity submitting to me 
bringing order to chaos.  And it is my go-to for creating applications for 
web browsers, so that I don't have to put up with stuff I loathe putting up 
with.

However, If I'm not going to war with intertwingularity and not working on 
a browser-based application, there are two things that have me tossing 
TiddlyWiki aside in favour of FeatherWiki.

The first is lightness.  There is no comparison.  Lightning quick to open, 
to save, to work with.  Yes, it is light on features, but that is a win 
when they are all the features that are needed for the job at hand.

Second, lightness in the interface along with a WYSIWYG editor: what a huge 
impact on cognitive load.

Strangely enough, I want nothing to do with WYSIWYG in TiddlyWiki.  
Although I loathe wikitext (just as I loathe markdown, part of why I cannot 
stand Talk.TiddlyWiki), it is a small cognitive price to pay for the amount 
of cognitive gain I get using TiddlyWiki (for the things I use TiddlyWiki 
for).  As long as the benefit outweighs the cost, I'm in.  Besides, mixing 
and matching WYSIWYG with TiddlyWiki programming (i.e. widgets, 
transclusion, HTML, CSS): yuck.

Huh: When I'm in "programming mode", I want nothing to do with WYSIWYG.  
When I"m in "writing mode", I desperately need WYSIWYG.



On Friday, December 16, 2022 at 12:12:30 AM UTC-4 Charlie Veniot wrote:

> A simple and light tool to provide an organised "explorer" for files 
> stored on a web server.
>
> Example: BASIC Anywhere Machine - Sample Programs 
> <https://basicanywheremachine.neocities.org/sample_programs/BAM_SamplePrograms>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a1873afc-17c2-4162-913f-9e8738c7895cn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to