Interesting! The documentation DOES imply that you can tuck :reverse into
the very place where you had it!
Perhaps this is just an error in documentation? In fact it works fine if it
comes *before* the sort-type parameter:
`{{{ [has[version]] :sort:reverse:version[get[version]] }}}`
On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 7:31:00 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
> I see, I can use that separate reverse operator instead of doing it in the
> initial sort.
>
> I'm still not sure how to use the reverse documented here in the flaglist
> in the :sort filter run prefix:
>
> https://tiddlywiki.com/#Sort%20Filter%20Run%20Prefix
>
> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 182937.png]
>
> I'll post any future questions in the other forums.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cade
>
> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:01:18 PM UTC-5 springer wrote:
>
>> Of course, I meant "come on over *from* google groups, and join us at
>> talk.tiddlywiki.org"
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 6:59:58 PM UTC-4 springer wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Cade! As you might note with other posts at google groups, the
>>> community for this discussion has migrated to talk.tiddlywiki.org.
>>>
>>> Although we (at that forum) can still *see* posts from the google group,
>>> we can't reply easily to them.
>>>
>>> So please come on over to google groups.
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, I can suggest that the documentation on the reverse Operator
>>> <https://tiddlywiki.com/#reverse%20Operator%20(Examples)> shows that it
>>> doesn't take a parameter, nor does it work as a parameter within the sort
>>> filter run prefix; instead it works at the "caboose" end of any filter to
>>> flip the list order. Something like this works at Tiddlywiki.com:
>>>
>>> `{{{ [has[version]] :sort:version[get[version]] +[reverse[]] }}}`
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 16, 2024 at 12:29:33 PM UTC-4 Cade Roux wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have change logs with a field for version information, and I am
>>>> trying to sort them in reverse order and it doesn't appear to be working.
>>>> The change log tiddlers themselves are also lists, but I cleared all that
>>>> out and loaded these into the latest TW version to make a minimal
>>>> reproducible case. If I take out the sort entirely, the 10.0 comes to the
>>>> top as you would expect for them to be sorted by title. But the sort
>>>> either with or without :reverse is the same.
>>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112417.png]
>>>> <ul><$list filter="[ascend.change[index]]
>>>> :sort:version:reverse[get[ascend.version]]"><li><$link to={{!!title}}
>>>> /><br/><$transclude/></li></$list></ul>
>>>>
>>>> [image: Screenshot 2024-04-16 112528.png]
>>>> What am I doing wrong?
>>>>
>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ea64f566-1e53-4bf3-89f0-8507e96c9124n%40googlegroups.com.
