For how to get rid of unwanted Tiddlers: in edit mode, just delete them. The main reason to use it in this setting is that it requires one mail out, rather than the cumbersome email experience. If you're using the on-line version, the ease of communication should be obvious. Don't let frustration and anger get in the way of using your head on this.
The complexity is based in the simplicity of the system. I know this sounds contradictory, but the simplicity allows for vast customization. It's hard to document this sort of thing. There are thousands of articles on this subject. Another issue is that it is totally free. Open source. No fees, charges or profits, so who is going to be assigned to document it? It's user based and user documented. It's not really intuitive, but if you work with it, you find it inspires delving deeply into subjects. On May 30, 6:44 am, AnnoyedStudent <[email protected]> wrote: > I actually find TW as an assignment tool very very frustrating. Our > lecturer at uni has decided that this is the best medium in which to > answer 3 simple assignment questions. I don't understand how to get > rid of orphan or missing tiddlers (and who really cares if they are > there anyway???) Is TiddlyWiki promoted to universities to use? I > don't know .. I do not find this system very intuitive. I actually see > it as a much more complicated view of a word document with hyperlinks. > I mean, there is still an index down side. > > What is the norm for referencing? You still end up with a huge linear- > like reference page? > > Any ideas? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
