Hmmm... not me, but I am sufficiently intrigued in your question to answer here!
What I am increasingly doing is using Tiddlywiki in real time to document group/team processes, whilst projecting the emerging TW on the wall so that my recording, sorting, and organising of the group's discussions/decisions is as transparent as possible to the group itself. I mostly do this with clinical teams (known for their passionate disagreements at times!) but am intersted in trying this more with families in dispute, etc (I am a child and adolescent psychaitrist.) The key here is speed, and simplicity, and developing a sense of when the points raised in discussion are new tags or should fall under an existing tag (I use the MPTW format and the "New Here" button a lot), or contain links... In terms of style and layout, I use the most basic layout, with togglerightsidebar to clear the desktop space, so nothing at all to boast about - mostly it is about listening to what is being said, rather than having too much mental space devoted to getting it recorded. But I guess what the groups I use this with seem to like is the "aesthetic" by which the TW format allows the ordering and organisation their different thoughts and arguments into a whole which can still express differences but clarify where these exist in relation to the whole. Often its very easy for a group to become overfocussed on a point of difference and overlook the many shared features (a metaphor for life, no less.) I am very interested in the conventional aesthetics of TW, though, as my TiddlyManuals project (http://www.tiddlymanuals.com) needs help - I know the kinds of things I want to do, but am too much of a beginner to make them happen without losing huge amounts of sleep. Have recently been helped a lot in this by posting here (http:// groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/browse_thread/thread/ e293cfc912f44a2e#)... Looking forwards to where this intriguing thread will lead! Dickon On Sep 17, 2:07 pm, twgrp <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, funny question. But for a reason that will be obvious later. > > So, guys, who among us would you say have good aesthetic sense and > competence to realize it in a TW? > > Thank you > > :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
