On Oct 15, 1:31 am, PMario <[email protected]> wrote: > Why does a "dropdown" menue discussion cause tiddlyworld to be splitted ?
The discussion is clearly misnamed by now, but anyway; It was split because it became unsustainable to use the site itself as the development place for the site. I guess one could say the mixup of the real thing with the meta aspects got confusing. Although it is admittedly an experimental process. > There are: > 1)tiddlyworld .. > 2)community .. > 3)communitydev .. tiddlyworld will be erased. The distinction between 2 and 3 will get clearer as they're cleaned up. BTW, you've been added as a member so feel free to do whatever you feel is good. While I agree that "tiddlyworld" is a cool name, I felt that particularly newbies get confused enough as it is with all them tiddlyshmiddlys (tiddlywiki, tiddler, tiddlyspace, tiddlyspot...). I wanted it to be neutral particularly since the URL already contains the t word. Also, I kind of like the idea that the name refers to what it is and that it rides on an established term i.e "the tiddlywiki community". > 4)showroom .. > 5)semantic .. I don't quite see how you include 'semantic' in this list (it has a very different purpose, no?). Showroom is something that I imagine could be included in the community Showroom section there but we're not quite there yet - if it is to happen at all. Showroom is solely Tobias project (as far as I know) whereas the community site is "the communitys" to develop. Also, the purpose of showroom may not be quite the same as the purpose of the community showroom section in spite of the striking similarity in names ;-) However, I was not aware of Tobias ambitions to have people contribute to his showroom space though. (The "contributors list" there seem to be more a tribute to TW titans in general.) But, I can only speak from the community space view, where the idea is to have anyone put in information and the community voting etc. Generally, the community space is aimed at handling the exact problem you address; there is so much redundance in the dispersed TW community and you don't know where to find stuff. Look at all the good hearted plugin compilations for instance. It is impossible for the poor individual behind those TWs to keep them up to date and there is no possibility for the community to e.g rank the plugins or comment on them etc in those TWs. Hopefully the benefits with a central and collaborative compiling reference place will be evident soon. Great objections - it helps define the concept! :-) > > For me they are somehow related. All of them want to have many > contributors. Some of them deal with the same topics. eg: showroom and > tiddlyworld. > > == > I think: > > Showroom menue in tiddlyworld space can link to showroom space. > Otherwise there will be duplicates. Even include can be a possibility. > But please no iframes. I do have a good resolution, but there is not > enough space on the screen to do this. > > tiddlyworld is an absolutly cool name for the project described in > tiddlyworld space. May be the existing "example/dev" content can be > copied to a dev space, to get tiddlyworld back for its "real" content. > But pleas use only one dev space. > > my 2 €ents > > On Oct 14, 10:26 pm, twgrp <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Check out the (renamed) split: > > >http://community.tiddlyspace.com/ > > - and -http://communitydev.tiddlyspace.com/ > > > (I copied it also into the dev space for lack of other idea. And, it's > > good sticking to Tobias great theme.) > > > I think it is time to start a new thread on this. I'm copying Tobias > > comments from above into there. > > > This is really exciting! > > > :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
