This is an interesting idea.. it's close to distinguishing and
aggregation [1]. However, grasping lines wouldn't be somewhat easy to
achieve - this is because Document Object Model (which is used in html
etc) has no conception about lines - lines are created by the browser
when computing the representation. Speaking about what JavaScript can
grab, I'd say it would be an exact quantity of words after or before
the "@..." (that number can be made to be a parameter of search). In
this case this seems to be a makable plugin.. as for now, I don't know
TW's object model good enough to make such a thing, but I'll take this
idea into account.

Ehm.. do you mean "lines" in the "source code" of a tiddler?

[1] 
https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/browse_thread/thread/3298c096d1e89eeb/bc173dfb903230d4

On 21 ноя, 18:28, whatever <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi!
> You don't need to know the tiddlers' names, just use
> forEachTiddlerPlugin (1), it lets you search by text, title or tags
> and also output exactly what you need. Plus, you can use scripts.
> Anyway, seeing an example of your file would help us get a better
> understanding of your problem. And of course a sample of your grep
> commands would help as well.
>
> w
>
> (1)http://tiddlywiki.abego-software.de/#ForEachTiddlerPlugin
>
> On Nov 21, 3:04 pm, Andrew Barbour <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Great dialogue by the way (love this community!).
>
> > From my read of Tiddler Slicing - you would need to know the names of
> > the individual tiddlers where the text string (actions) are housed.
> > In the use case I am thinking about.
>
> > I use the @ACTION to also track items I have delegated or that someone
> > else is doing that I want to track/follow-up on.  I use the
> > individual's initials after the @ACTION.  This way I can quickly pull
> > together a list of items I need to follow-up within someone on (great
> > for status meetings with team members).  I have been using plain old
> > text files with a Grep tool to search - it works well - but is not as
> > portable or robust as tiddlywiki.
>
> > I see this as potentially a more efficient implementation of the GTD
> > methodology - you are able to create the action items 'inline' and not
> > have to move to a different place to add them to a different todo
> > list.
>
> > I am a business guy - not a coder... so if anyone feels up to building
> > a grep like tool for Tiddlywiki.... I can offer testing and
> > documentation support.....
>
> > AB
>
> > On Nov 18, 4:39 am, whatever <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > How about using slices? That way, you can easily pull up all the
> > > "todo" or "action" slices (i.e. whole lines).
> > > w
>
> > > On Nov 18, 9:43 am, PMario <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi Anthony
> > > > On Nov 18, 1:40 am, Anthony Muscio <[email protected]> wrote:> 
> > > > The options within tiddlywiki are virtually infinite. The point I am 
> > > > making
> > > > > is the value of content in tiddler size bites linked by tags is very
> > > > > powerful where as resorting to content loaded tiddlers is more 
> > > > > limited.
>
> > > > You are right. At the moment tag based todo lists are very powerfull.
> > > > But it is different to, what Andrew wants.
>
> > > > Imo Andrew's approach is quite interesting. It creates "actions",
> > > > "todos" ... while writing, which doesn't interrupt the "flow" of
> > > > writing. It gets the "todo" out of your mind immideately, and it
> > > > preserves the context, why a todo is needed. So you are free to
> > > > concentrate, what is discussed in the meeting. You don't have to
> > > > remember "27 todos". And at the end of the meeting you may remember
> > > > the most important 3 (My most important 3 because my brain filters
> > > > that way :)).
>
> > > > I use GotoPlugin + SearchOptionPlugin from tiddlytools.com
> > > > Then I open several tiddlers, which I think contain the text that I'am
> > > > searching for, and
> > > > use the browsers full text search and highlight capabilities.
>
> > > > Which is a 3 step method, and sometimes annoying.
>
> > > > A new plugin with a slightly formated "full text output" would be very
> > > > interesting.
> > > > And a one step method :)
>
> > > > -mario

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.

Reply via email to