Yes, sure, 10.63 does save. The only problem with saving I had got was
saving TW-document which address contained non-latin characters. But
this is true for all browsers, as I know.

Was TiddlySaver changed during latest months? If not, I have no idea
why there can be a problem.

On 22 ноя, 17:06, Jeremy Ruston <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've had a look at this, and not got very far. I'm using Opera 10.6,
> and I'm unable to get file saving working using the TiddlerSaver
> applet. Could any Opera 10.x users out there confirm whether
> TiddlyWiki saving works for them?
>
> I'll do some more investigations over the next few days.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Jeremy Ruston <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> > Hi Yakov
>
> > Thanks for the response, that's very helpful. I'll have a look and let you 
> > know,
>
> > Best wishes
>
> > Jeremy
>
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Yakov <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >> I tried 4 sequences.
>
> >> I created a TW A with a tiddler with 32732 symbols and put it into
> >> DefaultTiddlers.
> >> Then I made 2 copies (AA and AB) of it and opened one copy with Opera
> >> 9.64 and the other with FireFox 3.6.10 (or 3.6.12, whatever). In both
> >> I added one more symbol and closed both of them.
> >> Then I made 4 copies: AAA and AAB - from AA and ABA and ABB - from AA.
> >> Those with names ended by "A" I open in Opera (not simultaneously,
> >> of'course) and by "B" - with FireFox.
> >> Only the AAA one opened with the error.
>
> >> So, the bug occurs only if the big tiddler was created in Opera 9.64
> >> and then the document was opened in it once more.
>
> >> On 15 ноя, 20:04, Jeremy Ruston <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > So, it's TW v2.6.1 with no plugins. in Win Vista with Opera 9.64 (an
> >>> > old version is used on a computer with no access to internet because
> >>> > it has a better search through web code). The previous crash was also
> >>> > there, as I remember.
>
> >>> Ahhh! It was Opera that we had problems with before, so I suspect that
> >>> this is a regression bug. I've created a ticket for it here:
>
> >>>http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/ticket/1276
>
> >>> Could you try another browser just to see whether it works? We'll
> >>> track down and fix the Opera fault.
>
> >>> > Hope this will help.
>
> >>> > Also, is the v2.6.2 released already?http://tiddlywiki.com/doesn't
> >>> > mention this, buthttp://trac.tiddlywiki.org/didsomewhere..
>
> >>> 2.6.2 is being prepared for a beta release over the next day or two.
> >>> You can follow developments on trac.tiddlywiki.org:
>
> >>>http://trac.tiddlywiki.org/query?group=status&milestone=2.6.2
>
> >>> Best wishes
>
> >>> Jeremy
>
> >>> > On 15 ноя, 18:18, Jeremy Ruston <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >> Although there has been the odd bug over the years, there is no
> >>> >> intrinsic limit to the length of a tiddler in TiddlyWiki. It's
> >>> >> possible that we've accidentally re-introduced an old bug, or perhaps
> >>> >> that you've discovered a new one. Either way, I'm sure we'll get to
> >>> >> the bottom of it.
>
> >>> >> Could you let me know what version of TiddlyWiki you are using, what
> >>> >> plugins you are using, and what operating system and browser you are
> >>> >> using. If you are using a lot of plugins it would be useful if you
> >>> >> were able to try to reproduce the behaviour without them.
>
> >>> >> Best wishes
>
> >>> >> Jeremy
>
> >>> >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Yakov 
> >>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> >> > Since I've ran into this second time and this time it was rather
> >>> >> > devastating I'd like to mention this and ask about the solution.
>
> >>> >> > The bug seems to be somewhat similar to the stack overflow. Create a
> >>> >> > big tiddler. Reload TW. Open the tiddler. Buttons on the
> >>> >> > ToolbarCommands become inactive and the tiddler contains more than it
> >>> >> > did - also text of some other tiddlers (and those are deleted as
> >>> >> > unique tiddlers _before_ big tiddler is opened) and grows.. it shows
> >>> >> > some code, perhaps the whole TW code, adds some more.. and stops it's
> >>> >> > growth. In the end there is some striked out code-formatted text.
> >>> >> > After this ToolbarCommands are available again.
>
> >>> >> > Opening tw-code of the tiddler shows all this nonsence, including the
> >>> >> > initial tiddler content and that of those hallowed by it, and the
> >>> >> > extra code, of course)
>
> >>> >> > Rebuilding the document and checking all the "missed" 
> >>> >> > (TabMoreMissing)
> >>> >> > tiddlers showed it's likely that all tiddlers are not totaly missed
> >>> >> > (they either remain usual tiddlers or get hallowed; in the latter 
> >>> >> > case
> >>> >> > tags and titles are missed).
>
> >>> >> > Previous tests showed that 32732-3 symbols is the border of the bug
> >>> >> > domain. This is a bit weird since it's not 2^k-1 (the nearest 2^k is
> >>> >> > 32768). Perhaps it depends on the number of cyrillic (non-//
> >>> >> > standart//) symbols but since TW uses Unicode, it is unlikely.
>
> >>> >> > Now, as for solution (if this is not exacly a bug, but somewhat
> >>> >> > "natural limit" like the size of the JavaScript lines) it would be
> >>> >> > good thing to intoduce some "notifying" to the edit mode - like 
> >>> >> > making
> >>> >> > thick red border around the editor and showing a message in the 
> >>> >> > bottom
> >>> >> > of the editor if the size is more than the limit (or even if it's
> >>> >> > close, with orange border).
>
> >>> >> > I understand that big tiddlers aren't a good practice usually, but
> >>> >> > when this happens remembrance of good practice doesn't console and
> >>> >> > anyone can get carried away sometimes)
>
> >>> >> > PS I'd like to appologize to those who answered the latest quesions
> >>> >> > I've asked and I didn't answered to, now I'm making the cleaning in 
> >>> >> > my
> >>> >> > TW-description and I'll join the discussions a bit later.
>
> >>> >> > --
> >>> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>> >> > Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
> >>> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>> >> > [email protected].
> >>> >> > For more options, visit this group 
> >>> >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> Jeremy Ruston
> >>> >> mailto:[email protected]://www.tiddlywiki.com
>
> >>> > --
> >>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>> > Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
> >>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>> > [email protected].
> >>> > For more options, visit this group 
> >>> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
>
> >>> --
> >>> Jeremy Ruston
> >>> mailto:[email protected]://www.tiddlywiki.com
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> >> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group 
> >> athttp://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > Jeremy Ruston
> > mailto:[email protected]
> >http://www.tiddlywiki.com
>
> --
> Jeremy Ruston
> mailto:[email protected]://www.tiddlywiki.com

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.

Reply via email to