That can be complicated it you're only using the [ ], [x] syntax and you have more than one checkbox in a tiddler. Assign tag to a checkbox, then you can search by tags. You can use CheckboxPlugi (1) or CheckboxToggleTag (2) for that.
(1) http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#CheckboxPlugin (2) http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#CheckboxToggleTag w On 4 jan., 13:07, octw <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe you'd like to take a look at this: > > http://goo.gl/riD3Z > > It uses checkbox to control whether the items should appear or not. > You can edit the tabs source to see the fET code. > > Cheers, > octw > > On 1月4日, 上午6時10分, Dave Parker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, I'm trying to make a FET that finds certain tiddlers that either > > has an unchecked checkbox or a checked checkbox. Here's what I've > > tried: > > > <<forEachTiddler > > where > > 'tiddler.text.contains("[_") && tiddler.tags.contains("DietTests")' > > sortBy > > 'tiddler.title.length' > > descending > > > Currently this finds all tiddlers with checkboxes regardless of > > state. I think this might have worked if I'd used the [_] and [x] > > method, but the tiddlers I'm sorting have this in them: > > > [_(tag value|tiddlerName)] has a certain tag value > > > so when checked, the tiddler gets tagged instead of the text body > > getting written to with [x]. > > > Any ideas? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
