Interesting no one has responded yet. I would take it as a certainty that the licensing you cite is only and solely about the software application, and has no relevance at all to content. I would be hugely surprised if it were otherwise. It would suggest, for example, that the great folks at WordPress have legal ownership of my writings at http://TheManThursday.com/tag/wiki merely because I use their software product. While Hyperfiction may seem to blur the distinction between application and content, in reality I'm sure it does not. My thoughts here are not intended to imply I have any competency or expertise.
On Jan 7, 12:59 am, "H. Humbert" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello there, > > I'm currently working on a Hyperfiction and using TiddlyWiki to > implement it. I'm also using some Plugins from TiddlyTools. While the > technical side isn't a huge problem, I'm wondering about all the legal > stuff involved. > > The Plugins are licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0. As it's Share-Alike, as > far as I understand it, when I publish my story it should go under the > same license. Is this correct? Would this mean that anyone could, say, > change the sentences she didn't like about my story, and republish it > under: "Pinky007, reusing a Story by <Insert my name>"? > > Or am I totally misinterpreting this? > > Thanks, > H. H. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
