In question of notability. I can't accept the statement that TW is not a notable management software. It's like mentioning that TW is not existing. Anything that happened should exist and mentioned in Wikipedia.
On another wikipedia submission, I was flagged about a source camp that did exist, however not much mentioned by third party sources other than the organizers. So it's the same meaning as not notable event but it did exist. There is some discussion list about this arguing the fairness of those people who run Wikipedia and criteria based on sorting out articles. So other sources citation should not come from associated TW developers or even this list but another, I don't know:( How much notability is required? Handoko - Julian Knight wrote: > Maybe it's use in BT could be highlighted. I'm sure there must be some > references. > > Perhaps we could all start adding to a references section at the end of the > article - or maybe in the comments page for now so that things can be kept > tidy? > > We should also link back to the TW Google groups and to related software > such as the TWMobile/TWEdit iOS apps. > > I'll take a look as well and see if there is anything that I can add or > tidy. > > Regards, Julian. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
