Hi Vlak, Thanks for the input!
1) Do you know in what context or for what usecase Udo did add a JSON data type? Did he use such data later on to generate js objects in an editable fashion? In general, I'd think something special / sophisticated like that really begs for being an addon to the plugin. Although working with indentation in TiddlyWiki's input-textarea is not such a pleasure, I was wondering if it were good to have the custom fields definition itself be based on a JSON format, rather than simple text chunks split by some arbitrary, yet to be defined separators. But then using an envaluated js object might be more suitable as it has more lose requirements as for syntax requirements. 2) "On the other hand I would think that adding data types is not really wiki like." What do you mean with "not wiki like"? I would call "wiki like" whatever can be used in the framework provided by a wiki. I mean, TiddlyWiki in itself is not as "wiki like" as other wiki frameworks. What I mean with that is that - due to it being a mostly single user, javascript implementation - its focus to some extend is shifted towards dynamic, scripted elements, as opposed to a focus on "mere" content and content structure alone in an open or multiuser editing process. However, TiddlySpace (or rather TiddlyWeb) is a big leap forward in the direction of a multiuser "wiki" environment. 3) "Maybe there is a concept of semantic types to use for it." Please expand on this as I am not sure where you're headed. Cheers, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
