I'm not sufficiently motivated to fix the themes for IE and Opera (at the current time) unless anyone wants to use it and requires IE support.
As for Caspian's use of space, possibly they could be moved closer, but the use of whitespace is intentional as it makes reading easier by reducing the amount of text visitors see at once. It's also fixed width so the larger your browser window the bigger the gap (but that's what browser level zooming is for). Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated. Jon On Mar 14, 6:48 pm, Yakov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jon! > > > Neither of them have been tested yet in Internet Explorer (nor Opera), > > The Lottie theme looks in IE exaclty like in FireFox; in Opera it is > close (user icons are not shown, but it can be because of lower-level > TS mechanisms, with the Opera representing many things in TS badly). > PS nope, in IE the ToolBar buttons are represented without pictures, > just as red blocks with text (view, more, close). It is also not due > to the theme, I guess. > > Caspian theme in IE looks close: besides the ToolBar buttons, the tabs > don't fit in the width: one label becomes below the others. Since I > don't know any embedded inspectors in IE, I can't say what's > calculated wrong. In Opera, there's an extra (!) empty (!!) button > between "permaview" and "close all". Also, these buttons have corners > in IE and FireFox while don't have those in Opera (border-bottom-right- > radius: 5px; inherited from #sidebar .tools .button, as DragonFly > sais). > > Best wishes, > Yakov -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
