On Apr 21, 11:24 am, Smandoli <[email protected]> wrote: > > Does anyone have experience using TiddlyWiki for wireframing websites? > > I have thought of this. But when finished, your scaffold (that's the > term I would tend to use) doesn't then contribute to the code. So I > would rather mock up the page using code that has some re-use value
Well, 1. The point is not to make pages you are going to use. It's to get the page requirements and page flows up in a clickable format that all team members can contribute too as quickly as possible. 2. While I'm imagining the main use a quick textual descriptions of pages and requirements, your point is actually not even true. The designers would be welcome to add actual html and images to the tiddlers as much as they pleased, so you could get as detailed as you wanted to get. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
