<<< Perhaps it might make sense to focus on and investigate scenarios and workflows where a master maintainer could pull content from contributors and thus (re-)structure all those content bits that ask for migration, besides a members individual content bits. - Tobias <<<
Previously I attempted to do something using morphological analysis with TW and teams. I think there will always be some mess. If not, something might get lost. The human sorting of the mess is meditation on it, the [[incubation stage]] in creativity Some links just came into my inbox: http://www.swemorph.com/ http://www.swemorph.com/it-art.html I am thinking that they might help somehow. The IT methods appear super-heavy-weight, but it is the same underlying approach / theory that Compendium (a java hypertext concept mapping tool produced by the open University) uses. It has some tag sets: IBIS, de Bonos six hats etc. to link things together.I think these are good ideas, but also like to see user defined and emerging schemas. The team will adopt these though their use or not - memes and all that I tried Compendium before fully embracing TW for my idea mapping, brainstorming, team work investigations. Its good but not webby enough, and Java. It, like The Brain does is not good at local files. - Alex [1] http://compendium.open.ac.uk/institute/ [2] http://www.thebrain.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
