Hi Hans Sorry I called you Jeremy - :-)
Cheers Måns Mårtensson On 27 Nov., 11:46, Måns <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jeremy > > > Would it be possible to get a more specific indication, for those > > users willing to stick with old browser versions in order to keep > > using TW? > > I can't and wouldn't want to stay with an older version of a browser, > because I have to see how my TWs will look and behave in the most > recent versions - to know what my "audience" will see - however feel > that TiddlyWiki features some special administrative options - like > upload of a customized document to ie. TiddlySpot, import of plugins > and a full upgrade to/from a local document which are *so* important > that we should have an application just for these tasks: > I use portable FireFox for upgrading TWs and to upload documents to > TiddlySpot: > 4.0.1 in > Windowshttp://sourceforge.net/projects/portableapps/files/Mozilla%20Firefox%... > and > 4.0b9 for Linux -http://portablelinuxapps.org/download/Firefox%204.0b9 > > If *someone* has the skills to create a portable FireFox (maybe even > OS agnostic [1]* ) especially customized for TW - featuring a package > of bookmarks and bookmarklets - that would be GREAT... > Saq had a lot of usefull bookmarklets - which I haven't been able to > find since his site/blog dissapeared - Eric's instant bookmarklets > (especially the importplugin) are obvious candidates. > If a such portable application were to be designed - it would also be > a perfect oppertunity to bundle it with a TW-document set up to use > the TiddlySnips FF-extension out of the box... [2] > > [1]http://portableapps.com/node/29808 > [2] My go at "freezing" TW and browserversion in time, was my TW-OS > project, which is a full/portable Linux-OS (ca 100mb) run from cd or > usb, bundled with some TW-documents and Firefox-extensions (especially > the TiddlySnip-plugin for > Firefox):http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/browse_thread/thread/157521... > > > IOW not looking for any certification or guarantees, especially > > regarding plugins, but a statements as to what's the most recent > > versions of the mainstream browsers that is likely to work with core > > would IMO be helpful. > > I haven't had any problems (as long as I'm *just* working online) with > the most current versions of Chrome, Chromium and Firefox on Windows > and Linux - so far . > When the talk is about plugins and browser versions - > I guess it would be logical to stay with the note about a TWcore > version - > I don't know of any plugins other than: > UploadPlugin, UploadTiddlersPlugin and > the "upgrade-plugin" which are directly influenced by browserversions > in terms of compability? > > Cheers Måns Mårtensson -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
