i think it would be a nice improvement to have a sortable table in the import tab. That way you could point your new TW towards you old one, then view them grouped by tags.
I think making improvements to already existing features might keep things simple the long run. I believe the TW5 node code can strip tiddlers out as well... Alex On 10 February 2012 04:59, HansBKK <[email protected]> wrote: > >> back to an "empty" state? This is in place of locating an older version >> of an empty TiddlyWiki. > > Of course you will also lose any plugins or other system-level content, but > that maybe what you want. > > As I build a new TW design I use tags (all my TWs use taggly tags anyway) so > that every non-shadow tiddler is tagged either 1. system 2. content or 3 > meta > > The last one is for non-code tiddlers that are there for infrastructure, > e.g. navigation menus, how-to's for the user etc. That way I can > export/import/clone TWs that have all the customized functionality but > without the user content itself. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/WJ1Vsv7JZX4J. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
