I would find this **very** useful, as I'm sure would others, but unfortunately don't have testing-time bandwidth these days.
However I going to be very presumptious here and ask if at all possible, could you also add (perhaps configurable) support for the Pandoc extensions? This would allow from some pretty amazing conversion possibilities on export, including - HTML - PDF - OpenDocument XML/ODT - docx/rtf - AsciiDoc/DocBook XML - reStructuredText - LaTeX/ConTeXt/textile - MediaWiki - groff man pages - Emacs org-mode - EPUB - S5 and Slidy The project is extremely well-supported in the GG, with John the lead developer often turning around wishlist requests within hours. Personally I'd love to see a Pandoc writer for tiddler-nodes formatted in TW's own markup one day, ideally with tags and navigation structures in place - in other words TW as a target output, another content delivery platform. There are wikis that already support Pandoc syntax internally, some even natively, others with plug-ins. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/tJcliRa_gmwJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
