On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:22:42 PM UTC+7, Wordius wrote: > > I've added the following question to the Quora 'TiddlyWiki' topic > (http://www.quora.com/TiddlyWiki/Why-do-TiddlyWiki-and-Google-Chrome- > at-least-on-a-Mac-not-get-on<http://www.quora.com/TiddlyWiki/Why-do-TiddlyWiki-and-Google-Chrome-at-least-on-a-Mac-not-get-on>). > > > > Not just on Macs, not just with Chrome, many people have reported problems such problems with many combinations of TW flavors, OS and modern browsers. The reason is that the latter have tightened up the fundamental data model for security reasons.
For specific TW flavors and combinations of plugins, many people have come up with ways to make things work for them, but the fundamental problem isn't solved until the next generation TW5 code is ready for prime time. FireFox seems to work, but everything I do day to day is geared to Chrome, > so I'm reluctant to switch. And I know I can run the two side by side, but > it's hardly ideal. For my many-plugin customized TWs running on Windows, the last Firefox v3.6 is the only platform that doesn't require more fiddling about than I'm willing to give and works just fine. I use other browsers for my day-to-day, just set *.htm to launch with FF and only use *.html for normal pages to launch my default (Chrome). I don't know about "portable apps" on Mac, the only serious downside may be that you can't also have a more modern version of FF installed, and make sure you check out how to "lock in" your version so FF doesn't automatically upgrade itself. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/9KoHl_6cHvYJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
