You can find my attempt at color coding in the "demo*" tiddlers. Definitely the basic code is too dense for any typical presentation purpose; I think it's more intended to illustrate the POS tagger results (which are quite flawed in some ways).
Anyway, for teaching purposes I will pretty much always be contrasting 2 or 3 features, because more is confusing for students. Also, I'll be talking to my classes about ways they think they can use the tool. But for 2 or 3 features, I think color works fine. You can see this at andrewsimon.tiddlyspace. The 2-line approach seems the best way for maximum detail/clarity. I might combine that with inline table editing as a way of manually fixing the errors, where 100% accuracy is important, but that has other implications (as in, a loss of dynamism). so might remins the operative word. Andrew On Monday, 9 July 2012 03:12:33 UTC+10, PMario wrote: > > On 7 Jul., 22:59, twgrp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Disclaimer: I hardly understand what this is about at all. Some kind > > of grammatical analysis tooI? > hihi, it's like me. > > > Anyway, here's a friendly suggestion: Instead of writing out each, hm, > > thing, after every word like this: > > Bonaparte/NNP has/VBZ been/VBN > > I have to alternate suggestions. > This format seemed to be "best practice". I did make it a different > color and smaller, to make the tags less "aggressive". > > Andrew did an other tagger, that just colored the words but I can't > find it anymore at his space [1] :( > > > 1) If it is desired that the text is still readible, then I'd suggest > > to (somehow) put each.. thing... on a separate row under the original > > text, like this: > > Bonaparte has been > > NNP ____ VBZ VBN > > I did a test page http://postagger.tiddlyspace.com/#TestSlices which > shows an other possibility to get some tagging per sentence. I used TW > slices to reference the texts. IMO this would be intersting sice you > can use the results using eg: <<tiddler "anyTiddler::o1">> somewhere > else in any tiddler. > > > I had to put in the line to create a space. In TW you could put in eg > > or perhaps put it all in a table. > > > > 2) If it is not necessary to see the very.. things.. directly, then a > > hover popup to show them would make for a more readible text, still > > with the analysis readily available. > > I'm sure, there are many possibilities. IMO @andrew needs to tell us, > what's needed :) He seems to be experimenting atm.... > > have fun! > mario > > [1] http://andrewsimon.tiddlyspace.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/VDZpVn-Jgb0J. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
