Thanks for the clarifications. I was unaware of the differences between TiddlyWiki and WoaS, and the varying licenses involved. For my purposes I was going to use WoaS, but due to the licensing I am going to use TiddlyWiki. I will be open sourcing the very small viewer that I am including with my app that will simply display the documentation page that I am heavily modifying so the end user has only the ability to view the documentation. This may provide a useful idea for other who wish to use something better than .chm files for documenting.
I'm also going to be adding a credit section on my app where I have the donations at mentioning TiddlyWiki being used for the documentation. Likewise, something on the document page around the line of "build using TiddlyWiki...". Were I an actual software developer this would probably be a lot easier...but I'm not. I'm just a guy, who made a program for myself that others have found useful, and have just upgraded it. Due to my user base and the way the program works I require a lot of documentation and picture-heavy walk-throughs. I probably could have just went with it since my app has such a small user base no one would have known, but I felt only right in asking before I did. Thanks, Nicholas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tiddlywiki/-/l1JJFmZeRToJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
