I started to use a text expander on iPad. Initially when I was writing
tidlers the difficulty of typing double brackets was severely slowing me
down. Then I discovered built text expander.

Instead of square brackets I use 'qq' and 'ww'

I also started typing plain text as a first draft, pre wikification
tiddler. I realised that I don't need the view template view initially.

I like being in edit mode. Sometimes when I finish editing a tiddler and
see it rendered, I loose focus on what I am writing. I then end up opening
up my style sheet and start tweaking my TiddlyWiki.... Hours pass....

I am guessing now, but I am thinking that TiddlyWiki 5 will be able to take
plain texts and magically wrap them up in a TiddlyWiki, links and all. This
would be realy good.



Recently, thanks to Firefox updating me and an unwise update to mountain
lion, I am looking at tiddlyspace again.
I liked the tiddlyspace edit space, it provides a specialist editor away
from the TiddlyWiki.
I also liked Mario's model of Aggregate, structure and refactor for
building knowledge.

In light of both the above  I stared to compose texts in a vanilla text
editor, the ones that comes with an ipad. For the last few years I have not
written in anything other than TiddlyWiki, but I found myself 'tiddling'
but without a TiddlyWiki. TiddlyWiki has changed the way I write, but not
in the way I though it would.

In terms of refactoring knowledge, writing plain text knowing that its
going to be wikified later makes me think more about how it might be
parsed, how structure might be added when refactored in another software
environment, TiddlyWiki on a laptop for example. My editor mode text is
looking better as I refactor it, and I think I am  finding that refactoring
the edit helps clarity of though, helps with focus on knowledge without
tweaking my UI

I also wondered if text expansion could be built into editing mode in
TiddlyWiki. A plugin similar to TB's auto link plugin but one which worked
at the level of editing mode. For me TiddlyWiki is all about speed, and
text expansion is a long and laborious process. But for domain specific
TiddlyWikis, a tiddler with shortcuts might be useful.

Say you wanted to write about  Csikszentmihalyi's theory of flow and
TiddlyWiki. I could use any uncommon keystrokes as shortcuts - 'cc' as an
example. Pressing the same key a number of times is easier than different
ones. The keyboard layout is not ergonomic, it's a relic.

Taking this a bit further, a set of abriviations could in included, ones
used by youths when they send texts for example. Then toddlers could be
composed as text messages and parsed into TiddlyWikis, transmogrified into
adult, teacher pleasing, text with standard spelling. Refactoring at the
level of parsing in the TiddlyWiki seems like an an appropriate place to
deal with complexity. We already compose text in numerous contexts, making
these editors in a TiddlyWiki system might be useful.

This is driven by recent conversations arround saving and TiddlyWiki and
WISIWG. Intead of the latter, I think that more wiki sytle markup at the
level of editor combined with text expanding might be a good idea.

The Firefox update is quite annoying. Although my TiddlyWikis and their
data a safe, the means of editing them are not immediately at hand. The
mountain lion prole, is perhaps my first scrape with the prospect of
spending a lot of time getting data back. It's made me reconcider storage
in plain text, something I previously thought was 'taking things a bit too
far'

Messing about with an ipad keyboard, where the interface has no moving
parts is frustrating, but the struggle may lead to a tool more closely
integrated with the mind and the way I think

Alex





















Alex

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to