I stumbled across a version of this behavior myself -- and discovered that
transclusions in the StyleSheet (whether intentional or not) can get messy.
(Click here for my
experience.)<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/tiddlywiki/yNDve9VdPIc>
My advice would be:
- Use PrettyLinks *ONLY* for deliberately transcluding other tiddlers
into the StyleSheet -- because that's what's going to happen when you use a
PrettyLink, whether you want it to or not.
- If you're using camelcase with no spaces (i.e., StyleSheetTest,
My_StyleSheet_Transclusion, etc.), you can leave off the brackets in
StyleSheet. This will leave you with a perfectly functioning link to the
other tiddler but won't transclude it into your StyleSheet where it gets
rendered inline with all the other StyleSheet content.
- To prevent unintended nesting of the transcluded tiddler's content
within the comments, code blocks, etc. of your StyleSheet, don't use
PrettyLinks inside of /*** and ***/, /*{{{*/ and /*}}}*/, /* and */, <!--
and -->, or /% and %/. If you don't nest them inside anything, you don't
have to remember how that will affect the transclusions later.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
