Nope current version is broken again. no amount of any command line arguments work.
Well frankly if chrome won't support file cookies even with the --enable-file-cookies option I had to manually set up setup, I won't support Chrome. Period. I am tired of the constant fight, or "oh that is not being used", or "it MIGHT be a security risk", or "<insert excuse here>". If _I_ have put in that kind of option _I_ have made the choice to use it how _I_ want. I have already crossed chrome off my browsers for tablet and mobile use, since they will not support a alternate color scheme for readability, so another platform does not bother me a bit. That also includes all the people I recommend software fo, and the company I work for, etc, etc. On Monday, September 22, 2008 7:07:46 AM UTC-6, Dave Gifford - http://www.giffmex.org/ wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I want to make sure I am clear about the whole Google Chrome saving > and cookies issue. Here is my understanding of the present situation: > > 0. When a Windows user tries to save in Google Chrome or IE, s/he gets > a window saying that is not possible. > > 1. Google Chrome supports saving IF you also go get a Java Applet or > somesuch. (I did that, and it works). Great for TW veterans like me, > but for newbies...not so much. > > 2. Google Chrome also supports cookies if you use an "--enable-file- > cookies" command line flag (see disc here > > http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWiki/browse_thread/thread/e8e5e37ba24fa53b > > ). > > 3. There was talk about changing things on the TiddlyWiki side and > making TW free from the need for cookies. > > My questions: > > 1. Is this an accurate assessment as to the current state of the > discussion? and > > 2. Is something really being done about that eliminate-the-cookies > discussion? Or is it going to be on a perpetual backburner like the > plugin repository? > > I for one want to register my desire to see TiddlyWiki get to the > point where it works on IE, Firefox and Chrome (not to mention other > browsers) without new users having to download applets or tweaking > their command lines, whatever those are. I know many people that > either wouldn't take the time to do something like that, or that would > refuse to do so because they don't know much about such things (I > don't either) and they fear that doing either of those things would > expose them to security risks. > > Most of my efforts with TiddlyWiki in the past have been in the area > of making TW user-friendly for new people. My new No-Brainer Notes > adaptation is another, more recent foray into the same territory. But > I don't want to make NBN accessible from my website and talk about how > easy TW is to use if in reality just to use TW you have to take a > crash course in enabling Javascript and configuring browsers for > cookies. > > I would love to hear your comments in this regard. > > Dave > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
