Hi Eric, понедельник, 18 ноября 2013 г., 12:59:29 UTC+4 пользователь Eric Shulman написал: > > I guess one would hardly need "tabs" with one tab; and, at least in Eric's >> implementation, nested sliders can't be used one inside another >> > > Yes they can... that's why they are called *nested* sliders! > > +++[click this]> > content > +++[second level slider]> > more content > +++[third level slider]> > even more content > === > === > === > > Recently, I've noticed that in some cases this works as expected, indeed. However, a while ago I've been trying trees of nested sliders and got different syntax bugs in each situation -- that's probably why I remembered that as "not supported". Unfortunately, I don't have a consistent series of tests, but quick tweaking brought me this markup which is not represented correctly:
* +++[something] text * more text +++[more] details === === Sorry for misleading comments. Best regards, Yakov. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
