Hi Steve > I've been wondering if the app's stability allow it to cope with larger numbers of tiddlers and is quicker than operating within a browser.
It's conceivable TiddlyDesktop might be marginally more resilient under high loads than an ordinary browser; partly just because it's a good deal simpler than a real browser (no printing, very little UI, etc) and partly because there's no chance of a third party browser extension interfering with things. But it's likely to be marginal: the best approach for dealing with larger number of tiddlers is to use the client-server configuration with lazily loaded images. Best wishes Jeremy. On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:19 AM, SteveH <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your quick response. > > The desktop app. seems nice and stable, I've imported tiddlers from local > files without any of the 'normal hassle'. > > I've been wondering if the app's stability allow it to cope with larger > numbers of tiddlers and is quicker than operating within a browser. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
