On Monday, May 12, 2014 6:42:36 AM UTC+2, RunningUtes wrote: > > Just wondering if anyone had tried to strip out anything to make a TW5 as > small as possible say for read only display of information.
Are you talking about a downloaded empty.html or a downloaded version of tiddlywiki.com? TW.com contains all translated interface languages. So your users may need only one or 2 of them. As mentioned already, you can create * as single file, that contains a static version of all tiddlers. No javascript ... should work with all browsers. * many static files, that contain single tiddlers. No javascript ... should work with all browsers. or * if you want TW functionality (eg: search), you could compress the javascript source code, to get a smaller file size. IMO at the moment it doesn't make sense to compress the core js code. ... I doubt it ever will. reasons: * A well designed server will send a compressed version over the wire, to the browser. So web traffic will be less, than the actual file size. * 621kByte sent 2100kByte file size ... tiddlywiki.com.html * 187kByte sent 892kByte file size ... empty.html * In my opinion, the advantage to have readable source code, outweights the win of less disk space. * Many users include images into there TWs. So if you include one image with about 300kbyte, the "compressed javascript" file size advantage is gone. * Harddisk space is cheap. * Maintaining a compressed TW is not cheap. just my 2 cents -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
