On Saturday, June 14, 2014 3:18:07 PM UTC-7, magev958 wrote: > > I did an other test transcludeing the CheckboxPlugin and it works fine. > Seems to only be the checkbox syntax making a mess of things?
I downloaded a copy of your tiddlyspace so I could experiment a bit. I can create NEW tiddlers that use and transclude the checkbox syntax correctly... but the existing tiddlers [[checkboxSummer]] and [[test]] don't work (as you reported). I also examined the generated DOM elements in the online tiddlyspace, and the 'viewer' DOM element for the rendered [[test]] tiddler is *empty*... which suggests that the <<tiddler>> macro is completely failing to transclude [[checkboxSummer]], rather than some kind of error in rendering the transcluded checkbox content. As an experiment, try editing [[checkboxSummer]] and removing *all* the checkbox syntax, but leave the heading content.... does the transclusion into [[test]] work then? If it doesn't, then the problem isn't with the checkbox syntax, but with something else about transcluding that tiddler. If the heading content does appear, then it may be necessary to use a javascript debugger to figure out what is happening. -e -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
