Hi Stephan > I have the feeling, the consistency is lost here.
The "list" operator was implemented back before the filter syntax allowed indirect operands. As I said above, I agree that the `list` filter operator is broken. However we need to fix it by introducing a new filter operator, rather than breaking backwards compatibility of the existing operator. Best wishes Jeremy. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Stephan Hradek <[email protected]> wrote: > @Jeremy > > Am Sonntag, 15. Juni 2014 09:47:24 UTC+2 schrieb Jeremy Ruston: > >> Hi Alberto >> >> The "list" filter operator replaces the current list with the content of >> the list field of its operand. See: >> >> http://tiddlywiki.com/#FilterOperator%3A%20list >> >> > I have the feeling, the consistency is lost here. > > To my understanding > [list[HelloThere!!mylist]] > > Should be > > [list{HelloThere!!mylist}] > > While > > [list[something somethingelse athirdthing]] > > Should be the fixed list of the 3 elements listed. > > So your example should be interpreted as a list with one element named > "HelloThere!!mylist". > > > > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
