Hi Stephan I have written a widget that sets the value of a text reference to the output of a filter expression. Currently, this will output a comma separated list (which will be transformed into a space separated list only if the text-reference points to the special 'list' field.)
Would it make more sense for this widget to output a space separated list? I wasn't around for any of the discussions with respect the use of lists of tiddlers, however there's a 'list' filter operator that allows the use of any field to be used in place of the special 'list' field and this makes no sense if the other field contains a comma separated list when a space separated list is expected. The *list* filter operator replaces the current list with the list > contained in the TextReference <#TextReferences> specified in the > operand. The default field for the text reference is list. regards On Friday, June 20, 2014 10:27:07 AM UTC+2, Stephan Hradek wrote: > > Because Jeremy did it that way. > > ;) > > Jeremy just had ONE special field in mind, which he named "list" and which > is treated special all over the place. > > All the other fields are simple "scalars", meaning that they just can hold > one string value. > > It is simply that way, but if I remember correctly, Jeremy wants to do > something about it. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
